A Comparative Evaluation Of King Vision Videolaryngoscope and Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope as Intubating Device in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 54
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the intubation time using the two devices.
研究概览
简要总结
The study entitled "A Comparative Evaluation Of King Vision Videolaryngoscope And Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope As Intubating Device In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery" was conducted on 60 ASA I and II patients of either sex aged between 20-60 years and in the weight range of 45 to 70 kg after obtaining informed consent. We compared the two video laryngoscope in terms of intubation time and hemodynamic response i.e., heart rate and Mean arterial Blood Pressure (MAP) after laryngoscopy and intubation. This was a single blinded Randomised parallel comparative study evaluating the characteristics of the two devices and its usefulness in clinical practice.
Results favours that King Vision video laryngoscope better than Airtraq optical video laryngoscope
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •ASA Grade I and II Weight between 45-70 Kg Patients planned for Elective Surgery.
排除标准
- •Previous history of multiple/ failed intubation.
- •Head and neck surgery.
- •Valvular heart disease.
- •CAD / Uncontrolled hypertension.
- •Presence of raised intracranial pressure.
- •Cervical spine injury.
- •Predicted difficult laryngoscopy except for all class of MP Grades Any pathology of the oral cavity that will obstruct the insertion of device.
- •Mouth opening <2.5cm.
- •Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the intubation time using the two devices.
时间窗: 2 years
次要结局
- To compare success rate at first attempt(To compare the glottic view using Cormack and Lehane Grading.)