Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2020/04/024818
CTRI/2020/04/024818
Recruiting
未知

A Randomized study to compare vaginal and sublingual routes of misoprostol following mifepristone for second trimester medical termination of pregnancy

PGIMER0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsHealth Condition 1: O048- (Induced) termination of pregnancywith other and unspecified complications

Overview

Phase
未知
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Health Condition 1: O048- (Induced) termination of pregnancywith other and unspecified complications
Sponsor
PGIMER
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
4 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
PGIMER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\.Females in above mentioned age group with singleton viable intrauterine pregnancy
  • •2\.Gestational age 13\-20weeks
  • •3\.Women fulfilling the pre\-requisites of Indian MTP Act, 1972

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\.Prior 2 or more uterine surgeries
  • •2\.Having either taken MTP pill from outside or self prescribed or with inevitable or incomplete abortion
  • •3\.Moderate or severe anaemia(Hb \<8gm/dl)
  • •4\.Heart disease, uncontrolled HTN(140/90mmHg), bronchial asthma, coagulation disorder and any other medical illness
  • •5\.Known hypersenstivity to mifepristone or misoprostol
  • •6\.Hemodynamically unstable at the time of presentation
  • •7\.Contra\-indications to the use of mifepristone or misoprostol like ectopic pregnancy, inherited porphyria, chronic adrenal failure , on immunosuppressants
  • •8\.Presence of vaginal discharge suggestive of vaginitis

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Phase 2
Comparison of the effect of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol in medical induction of missed abortionsMissed abortion.Missed abortion
IRCT201704179014N159Vice-chancellor for Research and Technology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences100
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison the effect of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol in termination of pregnancy of 12-24 weeksPregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium.Medical abortion
IRCT201106213485N3Vice Chancellor for research, Guilan University of Medical Sciences268
Recruiting
Not Applicable
A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF VAGINAL AND ORAL BROMOCRIPTINE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERPROLACTINEMIA AMONG WOMEN ATTENDING INFERTILITY CLINIC IN ABUTH.Fertility-female
PACTR202105631565416Irshad Asma64
Completed
Not Applicable
Study on compare of sublingual, rectal and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming 12 hours before hysteroscopyCondition 1: Patients who are candidates for hysteroscopy. Condition 2: Patients who are candidates for hysteroscopy.Noninflammatory disorder of uterus, unspecifiedInflammatory disease of uterus, unspecified
IRCT201105296626N1Tabriz University of medical science120
Recruiting
Not Applicable
A study comparing two different types of scalp pain relief in cases undergoing brain surgeries.
CTRI/2021/12/039041Dr Gita Nath