Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04477655
NCT04477655
Completed
Not Applicable

Prone Positioning in Non-intubated Patients With Severe COVID-19: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Hospital Civil de Guadalajara2 sites in 1 country430 target enrollmentMay 3, 2020
ConditionsCovid19

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Covid19
Sponsor
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
Enrollment
430
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Intubation rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Besides protective ventilation with low tidal volumes, prone positioning is a proven intervention to decrease mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, the evidence of this strategy in awake non-intubated patients is scarce. The investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial to define if prone positioning can reduce the requirement of mechanical ventilation.

Detailed Description

Despite ongoing trials of antivirals and immunomodulatory therapies against COVID-19, the treatment of moderate/severe disease is mainly supportive, including oxygen therapy and invasive mechanical ventilation when impending respiratory failure is established. Moreover, the associated mortality among mechanically intubated patients is overwhelmingly high. Prone position relieves the dependent lung regions from the compressive forces of the mediastinum's weight, leading to homogenization of the gas:tissue ratio between ventral and dorsal lung regions. According to a few case series, and observational non-randomized studies with small sample sizes, there is a consistent improvement in oxygenation in COVID-19 patients during prone positioning, however there are no clinical evidence that this improvement is associated with a decrease in the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation. Considering that prone positioning is a low cost, low risk and widely available therapy, more high quality evidence is needed, to determine if the benefits of prone positioning in awake patients also include a lower requirement of mechanical ventilation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 3, 2020
End Date
January 26, 2021
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Miguel Á Ibarra-Estrada

Principal investigator

Hospital Civil de Guadalajara

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients with confirmed COVID-19, and requirement of a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥30% through high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to maintain a capillary saturation of ≥90%

Exclusion Criteria

  • Less than 18 years-old
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with immediate need of invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Contraindications for prone positioning therapy
  • Do-not-resuscitate or do-not-intubate order
  • Refusal of the patient or decision maker to enroll in the study

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intubation rate

Time Frame: 28 days

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in the ROX-index 1-hour after first prone session(1 hour)
  • Mechanical ventilation days(28 days)
  • Adverse effects of prone positioning therapy(28 days)
  • Intensive care unit length of stay(28 days)
  • Total hours of prone position at day(28 days)
  • Total number of prone sessions at day(28 days)
  • Hours of the longest prone session each day(28 days)
  • Total days of prone positioning therapy(28 days)
  • Hospital mortality(28 days)
  • Change in oxygenation 1-hour after first prone session(1 hour)
  • Hospital length of stay(28 days)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials