跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/07/071010
CTRI/2024/07/071010尚未招募2 期

Comparative study of two different methods of I-gel insertion:Reverse versus Standard technique. - NI

Government of Gujarat0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
尚未招募

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1.Planned surgeries of either sex of duration of up to 2 hrs
  • 2.Patients aged 18 to 60 years
  • 3.ASA Grade I, II,
  • 4.Scheduled for surgeries under general anaesthesia with duration of up to 2 hour.
  • 5.Modified mallampatti airway grade I and II

排除标准

  • 1.Patients taken for emergency surgeries.
  • 2.Patients of any pathology of neck, upper respiratory tract or upper alimentary tract
  • 3.ASA grade III,IV
  • 4.Patients with mouth opening less than 2.5 cm
  • 5.Patients with history of obstructive sleep apnea, pregnancy, hepatic, cardiac, renal abnormality, alcoholism, smokers, diabetes, significant GERD, Obesity, thoracic,Neuro and Cardiac surgeries, Surgery in prone position

研究者

相似试验

Study comparing the reverse and standard methods of... | 临床试验