MedPath

Comparison of Autogenous Dentin Matrix Versus Bovine-Derived Xenograft for Socket Preservation

Not Applicable
Conditions
Alveolar Bone Resorption
Interventions
Procedure: socket preservation
Registration Number
NCT04239378
Lead Sponsor
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
Brief Summary

The present study is a human, prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial will be conducted to explore and compare the clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric outcome of autogenous demineralised dentin(DDM) versus bovine derived xenograft(DBM) for socket preservation procedure.

Detailed Description

* After local anesthesia a full thickness flap will be minimally reflected buccally and lingually around the tooth not exceeding 3mm apical to the alveolar crest.

* Tooth extraction will be performed using atraumatic extraction methods using Periotome.

* After extraction, the socket will be thoroughly curetted, inspected and irrigated with sterile saline solution.

* The socket satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to either test or control group.

* Intra surgical measurements will be recorded.

* Socket preservation will be performed with either Demineralized dentin matrix DDM(TEST) or bovine derived xenograft DBM (CONTROL). Bone graft will be extended to the height of intra proximal bone.

* Collagen membrane will be placed over the grafted site extending approximately 3mm apical to buccal and lingual crest.

* Flaps will be approximated with sutures.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Teeth indicated for extraction and subsequent implant placement
  • Age group of 18 to 55 years
  • Single rooted tooth indicated for extraction due to endodontic failure, caries or Fracture
  • Presence of >2 mm keratinized tissue to allow flap management
  • Extraction site should have adjacent tooth on either side
  • Systemically healthy patients
  • Class II or III extraction socket defects according to Hammerele and Jung(2008)
  • Full mouth plaque score(FMPS)<25% at baseline.(PI)
  • Full mouth bleeding score(FMBS)<25% at baseline. (BI)
Exclusion Criteria
  • .Presence of dehiscence or fenestration in any of the socket, more than 50% of bone loss in any of the socket walls
  • Medical conditions contraindicating surgical interventions
  • Known smokers and alcoholics
  • Subjects with known bone metabolic disorders.(Pagets disease,fibrous dysplasia etc.)
  • Acute infections at the site of extraction. Eg , Abscess
  • History of malignancy
  • Patients who have undergone radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Periapical pathology such as granulomas, cyst, hypercementosis, ankylosis.
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Maxillary and mandibular 3rd molars.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Test group -Autogenous dentin matrix and collagen membranesocket preservationTest group - After atraumatic tooth extraction , socket will be augmented with autogenous dentin matrix and covered with collagen membrane and sutures are placed.
Control group-bovine derived xenograft and collagen membranesocket preservationcontrol group- After atraumatic tooth extraction, socket will be augmented with bovine derived xenograft and covered with collagen membrane and sutures are placed.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Height of Alveolar Crest and Bucco-Lingual Ridge Width6 Months

Using Mapping Caliper and (University of North Carolina) UNC- 15 PROBE Measured in mm

New Bone Formation % and Residual Bone Graft6 MONTHS

HISTOMORPHOMETRIC

Alveolar Ridge Width Gain(ARWG) and Vertical Bone Height Gain(VBHG)6 MONTHS

CBCT (Cone Beam Computer Tomography) measured in mm

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Plaque Index6months

Silness and Leo index using UNC-15 PROBE with Rating Score Excellent- 0 Good- 0.1 - 0.9 Fair -1.0 - 1.9 Poor - 2.0 - 3.0

Bleeding Index6 months

Mombelli - Sulcus Bleeding Index using UNC-15 Probe with Rating Score 0- No bleeding

1 -Isolated bleeding spots visible 2-Blood forms a confluent red line on the margin 3- Heavy or profuse bleeding

Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Pain and Esthetics6 months

( Visual Analog Scale -VAS) Rating score, None (0) Mild (1-3) Moderate (4-6) Severe (7-10)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Krishnadevaray College of Dental Science and Hospital

🇮🇳

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath