MedPath

Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB3,IIA2)

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Cervical Cancer
Interventions
Other: Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy
Other: Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy
Registration Number
NCT04939831
Lead Sponsor
Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IB3, IIA2).

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare LRH (or robotic-assisted) and ARH in patients with cervical cancer (Stage IB3, IIA2), by a multicenter stratified randomized controlled study, mainly including the following aspects:

1. To compare the differences in PFS and OS between patients receiving LRH and ARH.

2. To investigate whether PFS and OS in LRH can be improved by more rigorous specification of surgical details (including tumor-free principles and standard surgical scopes).

3. To assess postoperative complications and quality of survival.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
1104
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Clinical diagnosis of squamous carcinoma of the cervix, adenocarcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma (Stage IB3,IIA2).
  2. Age ≥ 21 years and ≤ 70 years.
  3. Surgery type B and C (refer to Q-M surgical staging)
  4. Normal range of liver and kidney function and blood count (specific details below) Hemoglobin > 60g/L Platelets > 70*109/L Leukocytes > 3*109/L Creatinine < 50mg/dL Transaminase abnormal indicators ≤ 3 Maximum value of transaminases not exceeding 3 times the corresponding normal value.
  5. No history of other malignancies.
  6. Non-pregnancy.
  7. Physical strength classification: Karnofsky score ≥ 60;
  8. Subjects voluntarily joined the study, signed the informed consent form, were compliant and cooperated with the follow-up.
  9. No psychiatric disorders and other serious immune system disorders (e.g. lupus erythematosus, myasthenia gravis, HIV infection, etc.) (Note: Maximum diameter measurement of cervical lesions is based on PET-CT, or CT, or MRI)
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Those who are contraindicated for various surgeries and cannot undergo surgery.
  2. Patients who have received pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy irradiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer.
  3. Patients with recurrent cervical cancer
  4. Patients with CT, MRI or PET-CT suggesting suspicious metastasis of pelvic lymph nodes with maximum diameter >2cm after further improvement of preoperative examination.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomythe group of LRH
2Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomythe group of ARH
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
the rate of OS at 5 years5 years from surgery

Compare between groups(Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% CI for the effect of treatment on the 5-year OS rate.)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
the rate of PFS at 5 years5 years from surgery

The curves of PFS at 5 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The logrank test will be used to test the above hypothesis, the 5-year PFS rate difference and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for the comparison between the two groups will be estimated.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

🇨🇳

Shanghai, Shanghai, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath