跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06166654
NCT06166654招募中4 期

Optimal Diuretic Therapies for Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload - A Randomized Clinical Trial

Johannes Grand6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 939 人开始时间: 2024年9月5日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
939
试验地点
6
主要终点
Days alive out-of-hospital to day 30

研究概览

简要总结

Aim to identify the best strategy for treating acute heart failure (AHF) with volume overload, particularly focusing on patients resistant to standard loop-diuretics. The trial is a double-blinded, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Its primary objective is to compare the efficacy of loop-diuretics combined with either Metolazone or Acetazolamide, against loop-diuretics alone. The trial will also determine the optimal type of loop-diuretic to use.

Eligible participants include adults over 18 years hospitalized with AHF and volume overload, showing signs of congestion and at risk of diuretic resistance. Exclusions apply to those with acute coronary syndrome, low systolic blood pressure, prior renal therapy, or previous treatment with Acetazolamide or Metolazone.

The primary outcome is the number of days alive and out-of-hospital by day 30. Secondary outcomes include a composite clinical benefit at 30 days, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, and successful decongestion 72 hours post-inclusion.

The trial aims to enroll about 1,041,939 patients across three treatment arms over three years. The minimal important difference is set as a reduction in out-of-hospital days by at least two days, with an anticipated low dropout rate. The study's power is calculated to be 80% with an adjusted alpha level for comparing the three diuretic groups.

详细描述

Trial synopsis Title: OPTIMAL DIURETIC THERAPIES FOR ACUTE HEART FAILURE WITH VOLUME OVERLOAD - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Background:

Intravenous loop-diuretics have been the key component in treating acute heart failure (AHF) since the nineteen sixties and has a Class 1 recommendation in the 2021 ESC guidelines for heart failure. Hospitalization for AHF with volume overload is the most frequent cause of hospital admission among elderly patients and is associated with poor outcome. There is a high need for additional decongestant therapies beyond the recommended use of intravenous loop diuretics.

Primary objective:

To determine the superior strategy of loop-diuretics + Metolazone, loop-diuretics + Acetazolamide, or loop-diuretics without additional diuretics during in-hospital treatment for acute decompensated heart failure with volume overload and diuretic resistance. Furthermore, to determine optimal type of loop-diuretic.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The study will employ a triple-blind design (Participants and relatives, investigators and clinicians, and data analysts and outcome adjudicators)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Acute hospital admission with a clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure with volume overload.
  • Display risk of diuretic resistance, characterized by:
  • Daily loop-diuretics administration for a minimum of 7 days before admission, or
  • Insufficient decongestion observed in the preceding 24 hours (weight reduction <500g or negative fluid balance <1L) despite being treated with high-dose IV loop diuretic (equivalent to ≥120 mg IV furosemide within 24 hours).
  • Clinical signs of congestion, indicated by one or more of the following: pitting peripheral edema, ascites, elevated jugular venous pressure, or radiological/ultrasonic evidence of pulmonary congestion.

排除标准

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Systolic blood pressure <85 mmHg
  • Use of renal replacement therapy or ultrafiltration in-hospital before study inclusion
  • Treatment with acetazolamide or metolazone during the index hospitalization prior to randomization
  • Known allergy to any of the used drugs
  • Severe hypokalemia (<2.5 mmol/l) or severe hyponatremia (<125 mmol/l)
  • Severe hepatic impairment or liver cirrhosis
  • Known pregnancy

研究组 & 干预措施

Metolazone

Active Comparator

2.5 mg oral Metolazone at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- acetazolamide injection together with each metolazone-tablet.

干预措施: Metolazone 2.5 MG (Drug)

Acetazolamide

Active Comparator

1. 500 mg IV bolus of acetazolamide at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- Metolazone tablet together with each acetazolamide-injection.

干预措施: Acetazolamide (Drug)

Placebo

Placebo Comparator

Usual care with loop-diuretics as the sole diuretic (SGLT2-inhibitors allowed) including guideline-recommended increase in loop-diuretic dose and fluid and salt-restriction. This arm will also receive both a placebo-acetazolamide injection together with a placebo-metolazone-tablet at randomization and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3).

干预措施: Double-placebo (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Days alive out-of-hospital to day 30

时间窗: 30 days

Days alive out-of-hospital to day 30

Days alive and outside hospital until day 30

Days alive and outside hospital until day 30

次要结局

  • Win ratio of 1. all-cause death, 2. Readmisison, 3. renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction (defined as a final inpatient creatinine value ≥200% of the baseline value), assessed using a Hierarchical win-ratio' approach.(30 days)
  • Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire(30 days)
  • Decongestion score 72 hours after inclusion(72 hours)
  • 1. Clinical benefit at 30 days, consisting of a composite of 1. all-cause death, 2. Readmission after discharge from initial hospitalization, 3. new receipt of renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction (defined as a final inpatient creatinine value ≥200% of the baseline value), assessed using a Hierarchical win-ratio’ approach. 2. Days alive and outside hospital until day 90 3. Days of admittance in the primary admission

研究者

发起方
Johannes Grand
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Johannes Grand

Principal Investigator

Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验