MedPath

Cryaoablation Assisted Partial Nephrectomy a Non Ischemic Approach

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Kidney Neoplasms
Interventions
Device: Cryoablation Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
Registration Number
NCT05218811
Lead Sponsor
Urological Research Network, LLC
Brief Summary

Patients with renal masses eligible to partial nephrectomy often require arterial ischemia to control or prevent blood loss during this surgical procedure. This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of renal cryoablation at the tumor bed, as a substitute measure or technique vs total or selective arterial renal ischemia.

Detailed Description

Nephron sparring surgery has emerged as the procedure of choice for most patients with renal tumors that are \>2 cm and harbor a greater than 50% exophitic component. In order to decrease blood loss surgeons may: 1- interrupt blood flow to the kidney, completely or selectively; 2-Use diuretics such as mannitol to dehydrate the kidney; 3-Ice externally the kidney - in open procedures - to decrease metabolism during ischemia.

The emergence of robotic surgery triggered a shift in the the surgical approach to partial nephrectomy and is commonly employed. A fundamental drawback of this technique is represented on the lack of cold ischemia. However, warm ischemia is commonly employed and requires dissection of the renal pedicle, which by itself puts the kidney at risk of loss.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with ages between 45-90-year-old.
  • Renal tumor ≤ 7 cm in the greatest extension, >50% exophitic.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior renal surgery
  • M1 Disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Treatment groupCryoablation Assisted Partial NephrectomyPatients underwent Cryotheapy assisted partial nephrectomy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recurrence - Oncological Control10 Years

Recurrence at Site of Excision or within 1 cm of margin or Development of Metastasis

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Survival10 years

If a patient expiries during the study interval we would procure the death certificate and do our best to determine cause of death

Local Re-Intervention10 Years

Either subsequent ablation or surgical exploration or surgical kidney removal

Incidence of Metastatic disease10 Years

patients will be evaluated using imaging studies at fixed intervals as follows: at 6 months Renal Ultrasound at 1 year CT Urogram at 18 Months, 24 months and yearly thereafter with Renal Ultrasound CT Urograms will be performed as needed for cause

Development or Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)10 Years

De-Novo emergence of CDK or changes in CKD overtime based on variation from baseline. The international classification for CKD defined by serum estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates (GFR) will be used as measurement instrument using the following definitions:

GFR categories in CKD G1 ≥90 Normal or high G2 60-89 Mildly decreased\* G3a 45-59 Mildly to moderately decreased G3b 30-44 Moderately to severely decreased

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Urological Research Network

🇺🇸

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath