MedPath

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Different Stepping-down Therapy for Childhood Asthma

Phase 4
Conditions
Asthma in Children
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04953741
Lead Sponsor
Xijing Hospital
Brief Summary

This study is a 24-week, randomized, parallel group comparative effectiveness study to evaluate the risk of stepping down therapy for patients with well-controlled asthma treated with combination Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and Leukotriene receptor antagonist(LTRA).

Detailed Description

Asthma guidelines recommend stepping down therapy once asthma is controlled for at least 3 months. Leukotriene receptor antagonist(LTRA). For children with mild persistent asthma, ICS twice a day combined with LTRA can be used for treatment, but there is no consensus on how to reduce drugs in patients with asthma that is well controlled (reducing the dose of ICS or stopping montelukast). We propose a 24-week, randomized, parallel group comparative effectiveness study comparing three approaches in patients with asthma well-controlled for at least three months on combination ICS and LTRA: Halve the dose of ICS firstly and then stop ICS with montelukast only, stop montelukast firstly and then halve the dose of ICS, and halve the dose of ICS firstly and then stop montelukast. Our goal is to compare the rate of treatment failure and determine the optimal treatment strategy. Additional goals include assessing risk factors for step-down failure.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • age 4-14 years
  • patients had mild to moderate persistent asthma. Patients have treated with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (equivalent to Fluticasone propionate inhaled aerosol 250 ug/ day) combined with Leukotriene receptor antagonist (Montelulast) at least 6 months of and had no symptoms of asthma for nearly 3 months under well asthma control(Asthma Control Test (ACT) score more than or equal to 20).
  • patients did not suffer from other acute or chronic diseases that may affect their growth and development
Exclusion Criteria
  • patients with severe persistent asthma or mild persistent asthma failed to be well controlled by low-dose ICS after starting treatment
  • suffer from other diseases: Congenital heart disease, chronic infectious disease, protracted diarrhea, congenital airway disease, congenital vascular ring malformation, congenital immune deficiency, tracheal foreign body, bronchial lymph node tuberculosis and gastroesophageal reflux etc.
  • patients with poor compliance stop medication or fail to take medication on time.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Stop Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol FirstlyFluticasone propionate inhaled aerosolReduced dose Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug once a day and continuation of montelukast once a day,and then stopped Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol and continuation of montelukast once a day
Stop Montelukast SecondlyFluticasone propionate inhaled aerosolReduced dose Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug once a day and continuation of montelukast once a day,and then stopped montelukast and continuation of Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug once a day
Stop Montelukast FirstlyFluticasone propionate inhaled aerosolstopped montelukast and continuation of Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug twice daily, and then Reduced dose Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug once a day
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Who Experienced asthma exacerbation or used oral/intravenous corticosteroids as neededBaseline (Week 0) to Week 24

Participants Experienced asthma exacerbation or used oral/intravenous corticosteroids as needed

Asthma Control Test (ACT) scoreBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks and 24 weeks

Change in participant's Asthma Control Test (ACT) score

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Peak expiratory flow (PEF)Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Change in participant's Peak expiratory flow

Forced expiratory volume in one second in predicted(FEV1%pred)Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Change in participant's Forced expiratory volume in one second in predicted

Forced vital capacity in predicted(FVC%pred)Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Change in participant's Forced vital capacity in predicted

Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide, FeNOBaseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Change in participant's Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide

Maximal mid expiratory flow in predicted(MMEF%pred)Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Change in participant's Maximal mid expiratory flow in predicted

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Pediatrics, Xijing Hospital

🇨🇳

Xi'an, Shanxi, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath