MedPath

Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-VII: Sirolimus-eluting (Ultimaster) vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents (Xience)

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Stenosis
Interventions
Device: Ultimaster stent
Device: Xience alpine stent
Registration Number
NCT03484234
Lead Sponsor
Seung-Jung Park
Brief Summary

This study compares angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with long coronary lesions treated with sirolimus-eluting stent (Ultimaster stent) or everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Alpine stent). The study uses a randomized, multicenter, controlled design approach.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  1. The patient must be at least 19 years of age.
  2. Significant native coronary artery stenosis (>50% by visual estimate) with lesion length of more than 25mm, which requiring at long stent placement without intervening normal segment.
  3. Patients with silent ischemia, stable or unstable angina pectoris, ad Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)
  4. The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and angiographic follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Any contraindication to any of the following medications: aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel, stainless steel, contrast agents, sirolimus, or everolimus
  2. An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of antiplatelet drugs during the first 6 months post enrollment.
  3. Acute ST-segment-elevation MI or cardiogenic shock
  4. Terminal illness with life expectancy <1 year
  5. In-stent restenosis at target vessel (either bare metal stent or drug-eluting stent segment). However, non-target vessel ISR is permitted.
  6. Patients with EF<30%.
  7. Serum creatinine level ≥ 2.0mg/dL or dependence on dialysis.
  8. Patients with left main stem stenosis (>50% by visual estimate)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Ultimaster stentUltimaster stent-
Xience alpine stentXience alpine stent-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
In-segment late luminal loss13-month
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Target vessel revascularization (ischemia-driven and clinically-driven)1 year
Target-vessel failure1 year

death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target-vessel revascularization

All death1 year
Composite of death or MI1 year
In-stent late loss13-month

In-stent late loss at 13-month angiographic follow-up

Stent thrombosis1 year
Volume of intimal hyperplasia13-month

Volume of intimal hyperplasia at 13-month IVUS follow-up (sub-study)

Myocardial infarction (MI)1 year
In-stent and in-segment restenosis13-month

In-stent and in-segment restenosis at 13-month angiographic follow-up

Angiographic pattern of restenosis13-month

Angiographic pattern of restenosis at 13 -month angiographic follow-up

Cardiac death1 year
Composite of cardiac death or MI1 year
Target lesion revascularization (ischemia-driven and clinically-driven)1 year
Incidence of late stent malapposition13-month

Incidence of late stent malapposition at 13-month IVUS follow-up (sub-study)

Procedural success5 days

Procedural success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of \<30% by QCA using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, Q wave MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Asan Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Gangwon National Univ. Hospital

🇰🇷

Chuncheon, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath