Comparison of the Long-term Radial Artery Occlusion in Coronary Diagnosis and Intervention Via Distal vs Conventional Radial Approach: Randomized-controlled Trial(CONDITION)
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Sponsor
- Wujin People's Hospital
- Enrollment
- 801
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- long-term radial artery occlusion
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Randomized-controlled trial to comparison of the long-term radial artery occlusion in coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal vs conventional radial approach
Detailed Description
Coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal radial artery is prevalent worldwide. This study aims to explore the long-term radial artery occlusion after coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal radial artery at 3 months after procedure using portable high-frequent ultrasound. The secondary endpoints include the success rate of puncture, time of puncture, duration of hemostasis, radial artery trauma, etc.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age ≥ 18 years;
- •Palpable unilateral distal radial and radial artery
Exclusion Criteria
- •Age ≥ 90years;
- •Height≥ 185cm;
- •Cardiogenic shock;
- •Contraindications to puncture at the puncture site;
- •Inability to obtain written informed consent
- •Previous right radial or distal artery intervention
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
long-term radial artery occlusion
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
Number of participants with the forearm radial artery occlusion is detected using high-frequent ultrasound at 3 months after procedure
Secondary Outcomes
- Radial artery trauma(at 24 hours and 3 months post procedure)
- radial artery occlusion(at 24 hours after procedure)
- success rate of puncture(at 24 hours post procedure)
- time of puncture(at 24 hours post procedure)