Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2025/08/092207
CTRI/2025/08/092207
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

To compare clinical versus ultrasound assessment for correct placement of Laryngeal Mask Airway Blockbuster: A randomized prospective study

Government Institute of Medical Sciences1 site in 1 country78 target enrollmentStarted: August 1, 2025Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Government Institute of Medical Sciences
Enrollment
78
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To compare clinical versus ultrasound assessment for correct placement of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Blockbuster in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia.

Overview

Brief Summary

The development of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) has revolutionized airway management during general anesthesia. The use of SADs is now standard in airway management technique, and they fill the niche between the face mask and tracheal tube in terms of both airway anatomy and degree of invasion. Anesthesiologists need an effective and reliable method to confirm LMA placement definitively without interrupting ventilation. Ultrasound is noninvasive, and can be a reliable means of assessing the correct placement of SADs [1-3]. The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is widely used as they are easier to insert than an endotracheal tube, but there is a greater likelihood of misplacement. Anaesthesiologists may not always be able to confirm the exact position of an LMA promptly, potentially resulting in inadequate ventilation, and in turn resulting in need for reinsertion. To avoid these complications, it is essential to be able to determine the reason for inadequate ventilation quickly. Current methods to assess LMA placement include the following: auscultation, the leakage test, insertion of a suction tube into the drainage conduit, the bubble test, and fiberoptic examination [2, 3, 7]. While these techniques are simple and widely used, in recent years, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive tool for real-time airway assessment.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I&II, Age 18.5-60 years, BMI 18-30 kg/m2 Undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia in the supine position.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with History of difficult airway, history of airway stenosis, airway mass, hyperthyroidism, goitre, carotid stenosis, gastroesophageal reflux, aspiration, and • history of neck surgery.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare clinical versus ultrasound assessment for correct placement of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Blockbuster in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia.

Time Frame: 5 mins, 10 mins, 20 mins, 30 mins

Secondary Outcomes

  • 1. To measure and compare the average peak inspiratory pressure during inspiration in both the groups.(2.To measure total time taken for assessment of correct placement of LMA Blockbuster by each method.)

Investigators

Sponsor
Government Institute of Medical Sciences
Sponsor Class
Government medical college
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Shivi Mishra

Government Institute Of Medical Sciences

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials