MedPath

To Evaluate the Performance and Safety of YVOIRE Volume Plus for Improvement of Mid-face Volume

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Midface Volume Deficit
Interventions
Device: Restylane Lyft with Lidocaine
Device: YVOIRE volume plus
Registration Number
NCT04784299
Lead Sponsor
LG Chem
Brief Summary

A Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of YVOIRE volume plus for Temporary Improvement of Mid-face Volume

Detailed Description

This is a Randomized, Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Design Investigation to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of YVOIRE volume plus versus Restylane Lyft with Lidocaine for Temporary Improvement of Mid-face Volume.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
105
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male and female aged between 21 to 75 years (inclusive)
  • 2 or 3 on the 5-point MFVLRS (Mid Face Volume Loss Rating Scale)
  • Desire cheek augmentation to correct volume deficit in the midface.
  • Agree to use contraception
  • Sign Informed Consent Form
Exclusion Criteria
  • have undergone facial plastic surgery, tissue grafting, or tissue augmentation with silicone, fat, or other permanent, or semi-permanent dermal fillers in the midface area
  • have undergone temporary facial dermal filler injections with HA-based fillers within 12 months, porcine-based collagen fillers within 24 months prior to screening
  • have mid-face volume deficit due to congenital defect, trauma, abnormalities in adipose tissue related to immune-mediated diseases
  • have history of anaphylaxis, multiple severe allergies, or allergy to lidocaine, HA products, or Streptococcal protein
  • have history of bleeding disorder
  • have a tendency to develop hypertrophic scarring or keloid

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Restylane Lyft with LidocaineRestylane Lyft with LidocaineHyaluronic acid dermal filler
YVOIRE volume plusYVOIRE volume plusHyaluronic acid dermal filler
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Responder rate of YVOIRE volume plus24 weeks from baseline

To confirm performance of YVOIRE volume plus by the responder rate (defined as at least 1-point improvement from Baseline) at 24 weeks after the final treatment

Non-inferiority of YVOIRE volume plus versus Restylane Lyft with Lidocaine24 weeks from baseline

To demonstrate non-inferiority of YVOIRE volume plus versus Restylane Lyft with Lidocaine in the improvement of mid face volume by comparing the mean change from Baseline in the Mid Face Volume Loss Rating Scale (MFVLRS) at 24 weeks after the final treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Score of Mid Face Volume Loss Rating Scale (MFVLRS)4, 8, 12, 24, 52 weeks from baseline

o compare the performance of YVOIRE volume plus to Restylane Lyft with Lidocaine based on the MFVLRS

The mean scores of the GAIS4, 8, 12, 24, 52 weeks from baseline

To compare the performance of YVOIRE volume plus to Restylane Lyft with Lidocaine based on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

Mean Change of Mid Face Volume Loss Rating Scale (MFVLRS)4, 8, 12, 52 weeks from baseline

To compare the performance of YVOIRE volume plus to Restylane Lyft with Lidocaine based on the MFVLRS

Responder rate of YVOIRE volume plus4, 8, 12, 52 weeks from baseline

To confirm performance of YVOIRE volume plus by the responder rate (defined as at least 1-point improvement from Baseline) at 24 weeks after the final treatment

Mean change in mid-face volume24 weeks from baseline

To compare the performance of YVOIRE volume plus to Restylane Lyft with Lidocaine based on the three dimensional (3-D) photograph measurement

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

LG Chem investigational site 01

🇩🇪

Munich, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath