MedPath

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of YVOIRE® Contour Compared With Restylane SubQ™ Injected Into the Anteromedial Malar Region

Not Applicable
Conditions
Normal, Healthy Adults With Moderate, Severe, or Very Severe Volume Loss of Anteromedial Malar Region
Interventions
Device: YVOIRE® contour
Device: Restylane SubQ™
Registration Number
NCT02119780
Lead Sponsor
LG Life Sciences
Brief Summary

This study is purposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of YVOIRE® contour compared with Restylane SubQ™ injected into the anteromedial malar region.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
83
Inclusion Criteria
  • Be male or female, 20-65 years of age

  • Have anteromedial malar region volume loss as grade 2, 3, or 4 on the Mid Face Aesthetic Scale (MFAS) symmetrically on both sides

  • Desire filler treatment to correct volume loss in the anteromedial malar region

  • Accept the obligation not to receive any other mid facial procedures or treatments during the study

  • Signed informed consent

  • Those who fall under one of the following 3 cases

    1. Males or females who are surgically sterile
    2. Post-menopausal females who are above 45 years of age and 2 years after the last menstruation
    3. Fertile premenopausal females or males without having a surgical sterilization, who have agreed to use at least two contraception methods (one of the barrier methods must be included) for up to 14 days after the last treatment of the investigational device to avoid pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Have a history of hypertrophic scars or keloids
  • Other criteria as identified in the protocol

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
YVOIRE® contourYVOIRE® contour-
Restylane SubQ™Restylane SubQ™-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mid Face Aesthetic Scale (MFAS) score26 weeks after treatment

Mean of MFAS score as assessed by the independent blinded rater

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Responder rate2, 14, 26, and 52 weeks after treatment

GAIS Responder (at least a one-point improvement on the GAIS) rate as assessed by subject

Mid Face Aesthetic Scale (MFAS) score2, 14, 26, and 52 weeks after treatment

Changes of MFAS score as assessed by the independent blinded rater

Mid Face Aesthetic Scale (MFAS) Responder rate2, 14, 26, and 52 weeks after treatment

MFAS Responder (at least a one-point improvement on the MFAS) rate as assessed by the independent blinded rater

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) score2, 14, 26, and 52 weeks after treatment

Mean of GAIS score as assessed by subject

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath