EBUS-TBNA vs Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA
- Conditions
- LymphadenopathyLung CancerSarcoidosisLymphoma
- Interventions
- Device: 21G EBUS-TBNA needleDevice: Flexible 19G EBUS-TBNA needle
- Registration Number
- NCT02916459
- Lead Sponsor
- Heidelberg University
- Brief Summary
This is a prospective randomised diagnostic clinical study to determine whether the use of a new flexible sampling needle can improve the yield of endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for clinical reasons as deemed necessary by the managing physician or multidisciplinary team will be randomised to undergo either EBUS-TBNA or Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA. The procedure will be performed under local anaesthesia using conscious sedation or general anaesthesia according to usual practice at the trial centre. Specimens will be placed in saline and formalin and forwarded to the pathology laboratory. The specimens will be spun down to create a cell pellet which will undergo cytological and histological examination as per usual protocol at the trial centre.The pathologist, who will be blinded as to which technique was used to obtain the sample, will grade the quality, quantity, and cellularity of the specimens.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 250
- Scheduled for EBUS-TBNA as part of clinical care
- Lymph nodes larger than 10mm in diameter
- Age > 18 years
- written informed consent
- Contraindication to needle biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, anticoagulation, thrombocytopenia)
- Inability to obtain informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description EBUS-TBNA 21G EBUS-TBNA needle Mediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling using a standard 21G EBUS-TBNA needle Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA Flexible 19G EBUS-TBNA needle Mediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling using the flexible 19G EBUS-TBNA needle
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The difference in quality of diagnostic tissue obtained between the two study arms following 4 separate needle punctures per lymph node 1 week Both specimens (cell pellet and tissue fragments) will be assessed by means of a semiquantitative assessment of material (normal lymph node or lesional tissue) present using the formal scoring system described by Mair
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The difference between the two study arms in the percentage of lymph nodes sampled where enough tissue is obtained for complete immunohistochemical and genetic mutation analysis 1 week The difference in complication rates between the two study arms 1 month The difference between the two study arms in yield (quantity of diagnostic material) in patients ultimately diagnosed with sarcoidosis 1 week The difference between the two study arms in yield (quantity of diagnostic material) in patients ultimately diagnosed with lymphoma 1 week The difference in sensitivity for detecting sarcoidosis between the two study arms 1 week Sensitivity = True Positives/(True Positives + False Negatives)
The difference in sensitivity for detecting lymphoma between the two study arms 1 week Sensitivity = True Positives/(True Positives + False Negatives)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Pneumology and Critical Care medicine
🇩🇪Heidelberg, BW, Germany