MedPath

EBUS-TBNA vs Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA

Not Applicable
Conditions
Lymphadenopathy
Lung Cancer
Sarcoidosis
Lymphoma
Interventions
Device: 21G EBUS-TBNA needle
Device: Flexible 19G EBUS-TBNA needle
Registration Number
NCT02916459
Lead Sponsor
Heidelberg University
Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomised diagnostic clinical study to determine whether the use of a new flexible sampling needle can improve the yield of endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for clinical reasons as deemed necessary by the managing physician or multidisciplinary team will be randomised to undergo either EBUS-TBNA or Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA. The procedure will be performed under local anaesthesia using conscious sedation or general anaesthesia according to usual practice at the trial centre. Specimens will be placed in saline and formalin and forwarded to the pathology laboratory. The specimens will be spun down to create a cell pellet which will undergo cytological and histological examination as per usual protocol at the trial centre.The pathologist, who will be blinded as to which technique was used to obtain the sample, will grade the quality, quantity, and cellularity of the specimens.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
250
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Scheduled for EBUS-TBNA as part of clinical care
  2. Lymph nodes larger than 10mm in diameter
  3. Age > 18 years
  4. written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Contraindication to needle biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, anticoagulation, thrombocytopenia)
  2. Inability to obtain informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
EBUS-TBNA21G EBUS-TBNA needleMediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling using a standard 21G EBUS-TBNA needle
Flex 19G EBUS-TBNAFlexible 19G EBUS-TBNA needleMediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling using the flexible 19G EBUS-TBNA needle
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The difference in quality of diagnostic tissue obtained between the two study arms following 4 separate needle punctures per lymph node1 week

Both specimens (cell pellet and tissue fragments) will be assessed by means of a semiquantitative assessment of material (normal lymph node or lesional tissue) present using the formal scoring system described by Mair

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The difference between the two study arms in the percentage of lymph nodes sampled where enough tissue is obtained for complete immunohistochemical and genetic mutation analysis1 week
The difference in complication rates between the two study arms1 month
The difference between the two study arms in yield (quantity of diagnostic material) in patients ultimately diagnosed with sarcoidosis1 week
The difference between the two study arms in yield (quantity of diagnostic material) in patients ultimately diagnosed with lymphoma1 week
The difference in sensitivity for detecting sarcoidosis between the two study arms1 week

Sensitivity = True Positives/(True Positives + False Negatives)

The difference in sensitivity for detecting lymphoma between the two study arms1 week

Sensitivity = True Positives/(True Positives + False Negatives)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Pneumology and Critical Care medicine

🇩🇪

Heidelberg, BW, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath