EBUS-TBNA Versus EBUS-TBNB
- Conditions
- SarcoidosisMediastinal LymphadenopathyHilar LymphadenopathyMycobacterial DiseaseCarcinomaLymphoma
- Interventions
- Device: Endobronchial ultrasound guided lymph node sampling
- Registration Number
- NCT01467635
- Lead Sponsor
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
- Brief Summary
A prospective diagnostic clinical study randomising patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of enlarged mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes to have sampling using the usual EBUS-TBNA needle or a novel biopsy forceps (EBUS-TBNB).
The study aims to establish whether the use of EBUS-TBNB can significantly increase the diagnostic yield over EBUS-TBNA, without an increase in complication rates.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- Scheduled for EBUS-TBNA as part of clinical care
- Lymph nodes larger than 10mm in diameter
- Age > 18 years
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Contraindications for needle or forceps biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, anticoagulation, thrombocytopenia)
- Inability to obtain informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description EBUS-TBNA Endobronchial ultrasound guided lymph node sampling Sampling using endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration EBUS-TBNB Endobronchial ultrasound guided lymph node sampling Sampling using endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial forceps biopsy needle.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The percentage of lymph nodes sampled resulting in a definitive diagnosis (as defined in the protocol) in the two study arms. 18 months The definition of a "definitive diagnosis" is dependant on the diagnosis and is clarified below:
* Carcinoma/lymphoma: The lymph node sample is adequate to make a diagnosis as well as provide immunohistochemistry information enabling subtyping of the tumour.
* Sarcoidosis: The presence of well formed epithelioid non-caseating granulomas.
* Mycobacterial infection: The presence of caseating granulomas, positive Ziehl Nielson staining for acid fast bacilli, or the tissue successfully cultures Mycobacterium.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The difference in the complication rate between the two study arms 24 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
The Royal Brompton Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg
🇩🇪Heidelberg, Germany