Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide Versus Methylprednisolone in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00241254
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Brief Summary
Preliminary not-controlled clinical studies of the efficacy of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide administration in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis reported encouraging results, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted so far. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide as compared to IV methylprednisolone administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year, on the delay to confirmed disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The secondary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy at 2 years on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), the percentage of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS) and the number of relapses. An intention-to-treat statistical analysis will be carried out.
- Detailed Description
Background
Preliminary not-controlled clinical studies of the efficacy of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide administration in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis reported encouraging results, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted so far. A slight efficacy of Methylprednisolone has been reported in this indication.
Objectives
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide on the prevention of disability deterioration in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
The secondary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the number of relapses.
Study design
Randomized double-blind two-arm controlled trial.
Intervention
Experimental group : IV cyclophosphamide infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year.
Control group : IV methylprednisolone infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year.
Outcomes
Primary outcome : delay to disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score) evaluated every 4 weeks for one year, then every 8 weeks for one year.
Secondary outcomes : proportion of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the Z scores of MSFC three components, number of MS relapses, proportion of patients with adverse events and delay of occurrence of adverse events, quality of life questionnaires.
* Quality of life questionnaires
* Disability self-assessment questionnaires Main time of assessment : 2 years.
Sample size
360 patients
Statistical analysis
Intention-to-treat analysis.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 138
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects (Mc Donald et al criteria),
- Aged 18 to 65
- Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS ( Lublin and Reingold criteria)
- Progressive deterioration phase of at least 6 months and less than 4 years.
- Reduction of walking capacity and increase EDSS not ascribed to consequence of relapses (at least 0.5 point) in the last 12 months
- EDSS between 4.0 and 6.5 included
- Female participating must use contraceptives while on study drug
- Written informed consent
- Patient protected by French social security system
- Others diseases interfering with MS or treatment
- Recent history (within the previous 2 years) of drug or alcohol abuse.
- Patients with psychiatric illnesses who are unable to provide written, informed consent prior to any testing under this protocol
- Hemorrhagic cystitis
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Known allergy at cyclophosphamide, corticoids and in particular methylprednisolone
- Persistent infectious diseases
- Patients with bladder permanent catheterization
- Known history of cardiac arrhythmia after methylprednisolone intravenous treatment
- Abnormal screening/baseline blood tests exceeding any of the limits defined below : Hb < 9g/dl or Total white blood cell count less than 3 000/mm3 or lymphocytes count less than 900/ mm3 or Platelet count less than 125 000/mm3
- Gastric or duodenal ulcer in evolution
- Gut diverticulosis
- Diabetes mellitus
- Known history of active hepatitis (ASAT >3 X ULN)
- Known history of renal failure (creatinine level > 180 µmol/L)
- Psychosis
- Current or past (< 3 months) participation in another drug trial
- Prior use of cyclophosphamide, lymphoid irradiation, monoclonal antibodies anti CD4 or anti CD52 or anti-VLA-4 therapies, cladribine ou cyclosporine A
- Other clinical types of MS : Secondary progressive phase evolving for more than 4 years ; Remittent type of MS without progression between relapses ; Primary progressive type of MS
- Use of interferon beta, methotrexate or imurel in the month prior to study.
- Treatment with intravenous monthly corticoids in the year prior to study.
- Treatment with corticoids (3 to 5 days) in the 2 month prior to study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 Cyclophosphamide (drug) Cyclophosphamide 2 Methylprednisolone (drug) Methylprednisolone
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Delay to disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score) every 4 weeks for one year, then every 8 weeks for one year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score) every month during one year then every two months during the 2nd year Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the Z scores of MSFC three components Visit number 1, 2, 13(at one year),19 (at two years) and 20 (last visit) Number of MS relapses all along the follow up period Proportion of patients with adverse events and delay of occurrence of adverse events all along the follow up period Quality of life questionnaires visit 2, 13(at one year) and 19 (at two years) Disability self-assessment questionnaires visite 2, 13 et 19
Trial Locations
- Locations (26)
CHU Lille Hôpital Salengro
🇫🇷Lille, France
CHU Limoges
🇫🇷Limoges, France
CH de la Cote Basque
🇫🇷Bayonne, France
AP HP Henri Mondor
🇫🇷Créteil, France
CHU Dijon
🇫🇷Dijon, France
(CHU Nîmes) Hôpital Caremeau
🇫🇷Nîmes, France
CHU Caen
🇫🇷Caen, France
(CHU Montpellier), Hôpital de Gui de Chauliac
🇫🇷Montpellier, France
Hôpital Pellegrin, Département de neurologie
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
(AP HP) Hôpital Tenon
🇫🇷Paris, France
CHU Besançon
🇫🇷Besançon, France
Hôpital Gabriel Montpied
🇫🇷Clermont Ferrand, France
CHU Nancy Hôpital central
🇫🇷Nancy, France
GHICL Hôpital St. Philibert
🇫🇷Lomme, France
Hôpital La Timone
🇫🇷Marseille, France
(CHR Metz-Thionville) Hôpital Notre Dame de Bon Secours
🇫🇷Metz, France
CHU Nice Hôpital Pasteur
🇫🇷Nice, France
Fondation Rothschild
🇫🇷Paris, France
(CHU Lyon) Hôpital neurologique
🇫🇷Lyon, France
Hôpital Guillaume et René Laënnec
🇫🇷Nantes, France
Centre Hospitalier de Pau
🇫🇷Pau, France
CHU de POISSY
🇫🇷Poissy, France
(CHU Reims) Hôpital Robert Debré
🇫🇷Reims, France
CHU Ponchaillou
🇫🇷Rennes, France
CH d'Angoulême Girac
🇫🇷Saint Michel, France
(CHRU Starsbourg) Hôpital civil
🇫🇷Strasbourg, France