COMPARISION OF A NOVEL TECHNIQUE OF MASK VENTILATION AND THE CLASSICAL METHOD IN ANAESTHETIZED PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS.
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/07/054739
- Lead Sponsor
- JSSAHER
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Age group: one to five years
1. ASA I or II
2. Scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
1. Children with features of difficult airway
2. Syndromic children
3. Children with active cardiorespiratory illnesses
4. BMI > 30kg/m2
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare one-handed C-M technique and classical C-E technique of mask ventilation in unconscious apnoeic paediatric patients regarding <br/ ><br>efficacy of mask ventilation in terms of exhaled tidal volumes.Timepoint: From three minutes after muscle relaxant is administered till five breaths have been delivered with each technique taking a total of two minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Audible mask leak <br/ ><br>2. Ease of performance <br/ ><br>3. Procedural fatigue <br/ ><br>4. Need for oropharyngeal airway insertion <br/ ><br>5. Presence of gastric insufflationTimepoint: From three minutes after muscle relaxant is administered till five breaths have been delivered with each technique taking a total of two minutes
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
How does the one-handed C-M technique affect airway pressure and oxygenation compared to classical C-E in pediatric anesthesia?
What adverse event profiles are associated with one-handed vs classical mask ventilation in unconscious pediatric patients?
Which pediatric patient characteristics predict better outcomes with the one-handed C-M technique during mask ventilation?
How does the one-handed C-M technique reduce laryngeal trauma risk compared to standard pediatric airway management?
What is the impact of the one-handed C-M technique on ventilation efficiency in pediatric patients with airway anomalies?