Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03608306
NCT03608306
Unknown
Not Applicable

Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations of High Caries Risk Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial

Cairo University0 sites50 target enrollmentOctober 2018

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Dental Restoration Failure
Sponsor
Cairo University
Enrollment
50
Primary Endpoint
Change in the clinical performance using Fédération Dentaire Internationale' (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Clinical performance of bioactive restorative material versus glass hybrid restorative in posterior restorations of high caries risk patients will be evaluated over 12 months using Fédération Dentaire Internationale' (FDI) clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations

Detailed Description

The application of resin composite has been described as "technique sensitive". Although glass ionomers are inferior to resin composite in esthetics, there are specific clinical situations where glass ionomers are the materials of choice for restoring teeth as patients at risk for caries and with carious lesions due to its ability to release fluoride and to self-adhere to enamel and dentin. However, Conventional glass ionomer have poor physical and mechanical properties and are more liable to wear when compared to resin composite. The change in formulation of resin modified glass ionomer restorations allowed them to have improved physic-mechanical properties, combined with significant improvement in esthetic properties. Thus, in recent years glass ionomer as direct restorative materials have become more user friendly. Unfortunately, most of glass ionomers are not recommended as definitive final restorations for the permanent dentition in stress bearing areas because they do not have the physical and mechanical properties of amalgam or composite resin. ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE™ is recently introduced enhanced resin modified glass ionomer, which the manufacturer (Pulpdent Corporation, USA) reports to be the first bioactive dental materials with an ionic resin matrix, a shock-absorbing resin component, and bioactive fillers that mimic physical and chemical properties of natural teeth. They are durable, fracture and wear resistant, chemically bond to teeth, seal against bacterial microleakage, and release and recharge with calcium, phosphate, and more fluoride ions than glass ionomers. Thus, ACTIVA has more release and recharge of calcium, phosphate and fluoride than glass ionomers with the esthetics, strength, and physical properties of composites, combining the best attributes of both materials without compromising either one. EQUIA® Forte is a fluoride-releasing, bulk-fill system which consists of EQUIA® Forte Fil, a high strength glass hybrid restorative, and EQUIA® Forte Coat, a wear-resistant, self-adhesive, light-cured resin coating. With improved flexural strength, and acid and wear resistance, the manufacturer claims that EQUIA® Forte extends the recommended indications to include stress-bearing Class II restorations. The clinical performance of these materials regarding functional, esthetic and biological properties is yet to be evaluated. The FDI clinical criteria provide more detailed evaluation criteria and better differentiation between different types of failure; and incorporate objective assessment tools and a clear scoring system than other scoring systems. Thus, this study aims to contribute to providing evidence-based literature concerning current innovative Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations using the most updated and standardized assessment criteria, namely the FDI.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2018
End Date
June 2020
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mona mahmoud Abd Elrahman

Principal Investigator and PHD student at Conservative Dentistry Department

Cairo University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • High caries risk patients with multiple posterior cavitated carious lesions
  • Co-operative patients approving to participate in the study.
  • Pulp asymptomatic vital carious posterior teeth.
  • Presence of favorable occlusion and teeth are in normal contact with the adjacent teeth.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Low caries risk patients.
  • Anterior carious lesions
  • Lack of compliance
  • Severe medical complications.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Evidence of parafunctional habits
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders
  • Teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in the clinical performance using Fédération Dentaire Internationale' (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations

Time Frame: Change from the baseline at 6 months and12 months

(FDI) criteria includes : * Biological properties (Postoperative hypersensitivity \& tooth vitality, Recurrence of caries, erosion \& abfraction,Tooth integrity (enamel cracks or tooth fractures),Periodontal response (compared to a reference tooth),Adjacent mucosa, Oral \& general health) * Esthetic properties (Surface luster, Staining (surface \&margin),Color match \& translucency \& Esthetic anatomical form) * Functional properties (Fracture or material retention, Marginal integrity, Occlusal contour \&wear (quantitatively \& qualitatively), Proximal anatomical form(contact point \&contour), Radiographic examination(when applicable) \&Patient's view) For each criteria one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor). Subscales will not be combined

Similar Trials