Effect of Intensity of Treatment on Rehabilitation of Acquired Apraxia of Speech
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 36
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Accuracy of Articulation of Untreated Items (Generalization) Measured as Effect Size - Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Phase
研究概览
简要总结
A growing neurorehabilitation literature suggests that intense treatment may be desired to maximize the effects of therapy following neurologic injury. This investigation is designed to facilitate the development of efficacious, clinically applicable treatment for acquired apraxia of speech by examining the effects of intensity of treatment (e.g., 9 hours per week vs. 3 hours per week, while holding total number of sessions constant) with a group of speakers who have chronic apraxia of speech and aphasia.
详细描述
This research was designed to examine the effects of treatment intensity on outcomes associated with an established treatment for acquired apraxia of speech (AOS). Intensity in the form of dose frequency and total intervention duration was evaluated with Sound Production Treatment (SPT). The investigators examined the effects of intense dose frequency (nine, one-hour sessions per week) and traditional dose frequency (three, one hour sessions per week). Total number of treatment sessions was held constant allowing for comparison of total intervention duration (27 sessions over 3 weeks versus 27 sessions over 9 weeks). A two-phase, group cross-over design was used. Thirty-six participants with chronic aphasia and AOS were recruited. Twenty-four participants completed then entire study and were quasi-randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups - intense first or traditional first (12 per group). One group received SPT applied with intense dose frequency (SPT-I) followed by SPT applied with traditional dose frequency (SPT-T). The other group received the treatments in the reverse order (SPT-T followed by SPT-I). A two week no treatment interval separated the treatment phases. The outcomes of interest addressed changes in trained and untrained speech behaviors.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 21 Years 至 90 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Veterans and non Veterans
- •Males or females
- •Stroke survivor who is at least 4 months post-stroke
- •Speaker of English since childhood
- •Ability to pass a pure-tone hearing screening (aided or unaided)
- •currently non-hospitalized
- •Age 21 to 90 years
排除标准
- •neurological condition other than stroke
- •currently clinically depressed
- •history of speech/language problems prior to stroke
- •untreated psychopathology
结局指标
主要结局
Accuracy of Articulation of Untreated Items (Generalization) Measured as Effect Size - Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Phase
时间窗: Pre treatment, 2 weeks following the first treatment phase, 2 weeks following the second treatment phase
Change in accuracy of articulation of untrained items as measured by effect sizes reflecting magnitude of change. Production of words designated to not receive treatment (i.e., generalization items) was measured repeatedly in non treatment probes prior to treatment, throughout all study phases, and at 2 weeks post treatment with percent accuracy calculated for each probe (0% to 100% correct). Effect size calculations involved calculating the difference between post- and pre-treatment probe accuracy percentages with corrections made for variability (standard deviations in performance). The larger the effect size, the greater the change in performance from pre-treatment.
Accuracy of Articulation of TREATED ITEMS Measured as Effect Size - Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Phase
时间窗: Pre treatment, 2 weeks following the first treatment phase, 2 weeks following the second treatment phase
Accuracy of articulation of sounds in words, phrases, sentences designated for treatment. Assessed in nontreatment probes with productions elicited through repetition. Change in accuracy of articulation of trained items was measured from baseline to 2 weeks post treatment using effect size calculations as the indicator of magnitude of change. Percent accuracy was calculated for each probe (maximum = 100%, minimum = 0% correct). Effect size calculations involved calculating the difference between post- and pre-treatment probe accuracy percentages with corrections made for variability (standard deviations in performance). The larger the effect size, the greater the change in performance from pre-treatment. Positive effect sizes = increases in accuracy \& negative effect sizes = decreases in accuracy.
次要结局
- Speech Intelligibility - Percent Intelligible Words Comparing Baseline to End of Treatment Phases(Pre treatment & 2 weeks following each treatment phase)