Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy for Lupus Nephritis
- Conditions
- Lupus NephritisLupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00774852
- Brief Summary
This study is for individuals with lupus who have developed complications in their kidneys, or lupus nephritis. The study will determine whether adding the experimental medication abatacept to standard cyclophosphamide therapy is more effective in improving lupus nephritis than standard cyclophosphamide therapy by itself.
- Detailed Description
Lupus nephritis is an inflammation of the kidney that occurs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is caused by the immune system attacking the kidney and is among the most serious complications of SLE: left untreated it can cause long term damage to the kidneys or, in some cases, result in kidney failure.
One of the more common treatments for lupus nephritis is the "Euro-lupus" therapy. In this therapy, patients receive three different drugs - cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and prednisone - over the course of several months. However, some patients do not respond to this therapy and many only show some improvement.
In this ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis, an experimental medication known as abatacept will be added to the Euro-lupus therapy to assess if it works better than Euro-lupus therapy alone. Abatacept is a man-made protein that suppresses parts of the immune system that can cause autoimmune disease. While abatacept is experimental for lupus, it has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Abatacept is also being studied for use in other autoimmune diseases, like multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes.
Participants in the ACCESS trial for lupus nephritis will receive bi-weekly intravenous infusions of cyclophosphamide for 3 months, then will take azathioprine tablets daily for at least 3 months more. Abatacept or a placebo will be administered every 2 weeks initially, then every 4 weeks for at least the first 6 months. Treatment of abatacept or placebo and azathioprine may continue for the remainder of the year. All participants will take prednisone tablets daily during the entire study.
Because the ACCESS trial is a randomized, controlled study, each participant has a 50-50 chance (like flipping a coin) of receiving abatacept. Others will receive an inactive, placebo form of the drug. Note however, that all participants will receive the Euro-lupus therapy. As a blinded (masked) study, neither participants nor study physicians will know to which group a person has been assigned.
All participants will undergo regular physical examinations, medical history and various blood and urine tests. Many of these tests will be repeated throughout the study. Participants will be asked to attend 18 study visits in the first year, and one study visit at the end of the second year.
The study will reimburse participants for certain expenses incurred as part of the study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 137
- Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Active lupus nephritis (defined by: kidney biopsy documentation within the last 12 months using International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification- proliferative nephritis, active urinary sediment, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio > 1, low complement C3)
- Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result at time of study entry
- End stage renal disease
- Use of cyclophosphamide in the past year
- Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, moderately severe anemia
- Active infection, including HIV, hepatitis B or C
- History of cancer, except carcinoma in situ and treated basal and squamous cell carcinomas
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control abatacept placebo Abatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen Treatment azathioprine placebo Abatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen Control cyclophosphamide Abatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen Treatment abatacept Abatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen Treatment cyclophosphamide Abatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen Treatment azathioprine Abatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen Treatment prednisone Abatacept plus Euro-lupus regimen Control prednisone Abatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen Control azathioprine Abatacept placebo plus Euro-lupus regimen
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With Complete Response Week 24 Complete response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as CR failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With Partial Response Week 24 Outcome measure description: Partial response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement (reduction) \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol. Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks were defined as complete response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants With a Complete or Partial Response Week 52 Complete response: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder.
Partial response: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, and improvement \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline visit, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day or according to protocol dosing allowances in protocol.
Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis. Partial responders showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response by Week 24 and Maintained the Complete Response Through Week 52 Week 52 Complete response definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a complete responder (CR). Participants who discontinued treatment and/or terminated from the study were defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. CRs are those who successfully responded to treatment and had minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Complete Response Week 24 A complete proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5 and prednisone dose tapered to \<= 10mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Complete responders are those who successfully responded to treatment and have minimal activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Fulfilling the Proteinuria and Prednisone Criteria of a Partial Response Week 24 A partial proteinuria and prednisone response is defined as an improvement (reduction) of \>=50% in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at either visit -1 or 0, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day. Subjects who discontinued treatment or terminated from the study in the first 24 weeks are defined as response failures for all subsequent visits. Partial responders are those who showed some response to treatment and low activity of their lupus nephritis.
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study Week 104 A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response or a partial response at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the site investigator judged that the participant could benefit from continued participation. Non responders did not respond to treatment and lupus activity is moderate to severe.
Number of Participants Who Achieved No Response at 24 Weeks and Continued in the Study , Achieving a Complete or Partial Response Week 52 A participant who did not meet the criteria for either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) at Week 24 was considered a non-responder. After Week 24, non-responders were terminated from the study and treated according to best clinical judgment unless the investigator judged that the participant may benefit from continued participation. CR definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<=125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline visit, protein-to-creatinine ratio \<0.5, and prednisone dose tapered to \<=10 mg/day or prednisone dosing allowances in protocol. Participants had to meet all of the referenced criteria to be considered a CR. PR definition: a serum creatinine \<= 1.2 mg/dL or \<= to 125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline, and improvement (reduction) \>= to 50% in the urine protein to creatinine ratio at either screening or baseline, and prednisone dose has been tapered to 10 mg/day.
Lupus Disease Activity - Participants Who Were Anti-dsDNA Positive at Baseline and Negative at Week 104 Week 104 Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. One measure used to assess disease activity is the number of participants who were anti-dsDNA positive at baseline but negative at Week 104. Going from positive to negative is indicative of lowered lupus activity.Lupus Disease Activity - Negative Anti-dsDNA Week 104 Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: reduction in anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have autoantibodies (e.g., self against self) to double-stranded DNA. Double-stranded DNA is one of multiple diagnostic tests for SLE and levels may be associated with disease activity. This measure was the number of participants who had negative anti-dsDNA at Week 104. Having a negative score is indicative of low lupus disease activity.Lupus Disease Activity - Presence of Hypocomplementemia Week 104 Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
Participants were categorized as having hypocomplementemia if their serum complement test results (C3, and C4) were below the normal range at the site. Below normal complement test results are indicative of active lupus erythematosus.Lupus Disease Activity - Frequency of Flares Week 52 Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
Flares can be renal or non-renal. A renal flare is defined as two successive evaluations at least 1 week apart as proteinuria \>1 gm/24h for participants who attain a complete response at Week 12 and for all other participants either 1) Increasing serum creatinine and persistent proteinuria, or 2) Worsening proteinuria. A non-renal flare is defined as any new post-baseline BILAG A in a non-renal organ system using BILAG-2004. This outcome measures the number of participants with the presence of renal and non-renal flares from Week 24 through Week 52 by response status. Having flares is indicative of more lupus disease activity.Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Week 104 Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.Lupus Disease Activity - Patient Global Assessment Percent Change From Baseline Week 104 Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment (PGA), SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
PGA is measured on a 100mm scale and assessed at Weeks 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104. Higher values indicate greater burden of disease.Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Week 104 Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.Lupus Disease Activity - SF-36 Scores Percent Change From Baseline Week 104 Lupus disease activity was assessed by 7 different measures: anti-dsDNA, negative anti-dsDNA, resolution of hypocomplementemia (C3, C4), frequency of flares, patient global assessment, SF36 total scores, and BILAG-2004 scores.
The SF-36 is a quality of life assessment that was performed at Weeks 9, 24, 36, 52, and 104. Eight scale scores are derived from responses to the 36 items of the SF-36 questionnaire which were combined to produce the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The Physical Component Score is based on the Physical Functioning Scale (10 items), the Role-Physical Scale (4 items), the Bodily Pain Scale (2 items), and the General Health Scale (5 items). The Mental Component Score is based upon the Vitality Scale (4 items), the Social Functioning Scale (2 items), the Role-Emotional Scale (3 items) and the Mental Health Scale (5 items). Each component score is transformed into a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater quality of life.Lupus Disease Activity - Total BILAG-2004 Week 52 BILAG-2004 has 5 categories of scoring.Category A:defined by severe disease activity requiring any of the following treatments: 1) systemic high dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) IV pulse glucocorticoids, 3) systemic immunomodulators, or 4)therapeutic high dose anticoagulation in the presence of high dose steroids or immunomodulators. Category B:defined by moderate disease activity requiring any of the following treatments:1) systemic low dose oral glucocorticoids, 2) intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue glucocorticoids injection,3) topical glucocorticoids, 4) topical immunomodulators,5) antimalarials or thalidomide or prasterone or acitretin, or 6) symptomatic therapy.Category C:defined by mild disease.Category D is defined by inactive disease, previously affected.Category E is defined as the system never being involved.The categories are converted to a numeric score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) and treated as a continuous variable. Higher score= more severe disease activity.
Proportion of Vaccinated Participants With a Competent Immune Response Week 52 Among participants who are vaccinated, the number of who have a competent immune response at Week 52 as defined as having met both of the following criteria:
1. Pneumococcal vaccination response - absolute value \>= 0.35 ug/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a \>=2-fold increase from baseline in serotype-specific antibody titer for at least 50% of the serotypes tested.
2. Tetanus toxoid vaccination response - absolute value \>=0.015 IU/mL and, when measured 4-6 weeks after vaccination, a 2-fold increase from baseline in antigen-specific antibody titer
Competent immune response is indicative of low disease activity.
Trial Locations
- Locations (23)
Feinstein Institute
🇺🇸Manhasset, New York, United States
UT Southwestern
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Alabama, Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of California San Francisco
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
Ohio State University Medical Center
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Seligman Center for Advanced Therapeutics (NYU)
🇺🇸NY, New York, United States
Emory University
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
🇺🇸Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Temple University
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Lupus Center of Excellence
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Columbia University
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Unidad de investigación en enfermedades crónico - degenerativas SC
🇲🇽Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
University of Miami
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Michigan
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
University of Chicago
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
UNC Chapel Hill
🇺🇸Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
🇺🇸Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
University of California San Diego
🇺🇸La Jolla, California, United States
Wayne State University
🇺🇸Detroit, Michigan, United States
University of Rochester
🇺🇸Rochester, New York, United States
El Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INNSZ)
🇲🇽Mexico City, Mexico
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States