: Pain associated with Lignocaine conventional local anaesthesia and buccal infiltration using Lignocaine or Articaine during maxillary primary molar extractions -A Randomised Clinical Trial
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- who required extraction of maxillary primary molars
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2016/02/006605
- Lead Sponsor
- ONE
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 90
Inclusion Criteria
•Children with definite indications for extraction of primary maxillary molars.
•No history of intra oral injections.
•2/3 of root should be present.
•Co-operative children
•Who can fully understand the given instructions
•No severe systemic disease contra indicating tooth extraction.
Exclusion Criteria
•Parents of Children not giving consent for the study.
•Allergic to Lidocaine/Articaine.
•Children with underlying vascular or immunological disease.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the pain associated during extraction of maxillary primary molars with conventional Lignocaine anaesthesia versus Lignocaine and Articaine buccal infiltration.Timepoint: PERI OPERATIVELY
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine the efficacy of 4% Articaine hydrochloride and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride for maxillary primary molar tooth extraction without the need of/bypassing palatal injection in children aged 6-14 years.Timepoint: PERI OPERATIVELY