Clinical Performance of Low Technique Sensitive Self Cured Universal Adhesive Vrs Light Cured Universal Adhesive in Patients With (NCCLs): 18 m RCT
- Conditions
- Non Carious Cervical Lesion
- Interventions
- Other: Self-cure universal bond (Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan)Other: light cure 3m single bond universal bond
- Registration Number
- NCT04572386
- Lead Sponsor
- Aya Gamal ashour
- Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of self-cured adhesive versus light cured universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) resin composite restorations after 18 month
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- particepant with age rang 18-55
- particepant with non carious cervical lesion
- particepant outside age rang
- particepant with periodontal problem that might affect the teeth to be treated
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description self cure universal bond Self-cure universal bond (Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan) self-cure universal bond (Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan) Light cure universal bond light cure 3m single bond universal bond light cured 3m single bond universal
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method number of restoration with retention loss 18-month Frist visual evaluation to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria
Number of fracture restoration 18 month Frist visual evaluation to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria ( first visually for total loss .followed by tactile inspection using fdi prob for any fracture /rocking or loss of retention
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of restoration with change in colour or texture 18 month Evaluation will be done visually following FDI criteria to ensure no change in colour or texture of the restoration
Number of restoration caused biological harm 18 month Evaluation will be done following FDI criteria using FDI prob to ensure no change in restoration that caused any harm to the health of biological strucure