Low Frequency Shock Wave Therapy for Improving Post-prostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: a Prospective Pilot Study
- Conditions
- Erectile Dysfunction
- Interventions
- Device: 8 bi-weekly LIESWT sessions
- Registration Number
- NCT02746094
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate changes in erectile function (EF) before versus after 8 bi-weekly treatments of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (LIESWT) via IIEF-EF (the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function) scores.
- Detailed Description
The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate changes in the following elements before versus after 8 bi-weekly treatments of LIESWT:
A. EF categorical improvement.
B. Other validated measures of EF (SEP2 (question 2 of the sexual encounter profile), SEP3 (question 3 of the sexual encounter profile), GAQ (Global Assessment Question), EHS (Erection Hardness Score)), and the remaining domains of the IIEF score (orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, overall satisfaction), as well as the total IIEF score.
C. Harms/Safety: To evaluate treatment tolerance and potential adverse events.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- The patient has given his informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is a man at least 18 years old and less than 80 years old
- The patient has been in a stable, sexual relationship with only one other person for at least the past three months
- The patient is consulting for erectile dysfunction lasting for over 6 months
- The patient had a prostatectomy 18 to 60 months ago
- The patient has an erectile function domain score on the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire between 6 and 25
- The patient has at least a natural tumescence during sexual stimulation (erection hardness score ≥ 1)
- The patient has not had phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor treatment for the month preceding inclusion
- The patient is available for 8 months of follow-up and agrees to participate in all study visits
- The patient is participating in another interventional study, or has participated in another interventional study within the past 3 months
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, or is an adult under guardianship
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient, or the patient refuses to sign the consent
- Complete anerection
- Untreated testosterone deficiency
- Neurological disease
- Psychiatric disease
- Anatomical malformation of the penis
- Chronic haematological pathology with significant clinical impact
- Oral or injectable antiandrogen treatment
- The patient is taking blood thinners and has an international normalized ratio > 3
- History of erectile dysfunction before the prostatectomy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description The study population 8 bi-weekly LIESWT sessions The study population is comprised of adult men less than 80 years of age who are consulting for ED lasting for over 6 months following a prostatectomy that took place 18 to 60 months ago. The patients are currently in a stable relationship that has been going on for at least 3 months, have an IIEF-EF score between 6 and 25, and have at least a natural tumescence during sexual stimulation (EHS score ≥ 1). Intervention: 8 bi-weekly LIESWT sessions
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The difference in the rate of change for the IIEF-EF score before and after treatment sessions (change per two-month period). rate of change between -8 and 0 weeks versus rate of change between 0 and 8 weeks IIEF-EF = the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The difference in the rate of change for the IIEF sexual desire subdomain score before and after treatment sessions (change per two-month period) rate of change between -8 and 0 weeks versus rate of change between 0 and 16 weeks The change in the number of patients responding yes to question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile over a period of observation before the treatment sessions versus a period of observation after the start of treatment sessions. 0 to 8 weeks versus 8 to 16 weeks Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina? (yes/no)
The change in the number of patients responding yes to the Global Assessment Question (yes/no) over a period of observation before the treatment sessions versus a period of observation after the start of treatment sessions. 0 to 8 weeks versus 8 to 16 weeks Has the treatment you have been taking improved your erectile function? (yes/no)
The difference in the rate of change for the IIEF sexual satisfaction subdomain score before and after treatment sessions (change per two-month period) rate of change between -8 and 0 weeks versus rate of change between 0 and 16 weeks The presence/absence any other complications that might occur (almost none are cited in the literature) Week 16 The change in the number of patients with improvement in erectile function (EF) over a period of observation before the treatment sessions versus a period of observation after the start of treatment sessions. 0 to 8 weeks versus 8 to 16 weeks Improvement in EF is defined as a \>2 point increase in the IIEF-EF score from baseline for mild erectile dysfunction (ED), \>5 points for moderate ED and \>7 points for severe ED (Rosen et al. 2011).
The change in the number of patients responding yes to question 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile over a period of observation before the treatment sessions versus a period of observation after the start of treatment sessions. 0 to 8 weeks versus 8 to 16 weeks Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? (yes/no)
The difference in the rate of change for the total IIEF score before and after treatment sessions (change per two-month period) rate of change between -8 and 0 weeks versus rate of change between 0 and 16 weeks The difference in the rate of change for the IIEF erectile function subdomain score before and after treatment sessions (change per two-month period) rate of change between -8 and 0 weeks versus rate of change between 0 and 16 weeks The difference in the rate of change for the IIEF overall satisfaction subdomain score before and after treatment sessions (change per two-month period) rate of change between -8 and 0 weeks versus rate of change between 0 and 16 weeks The difference in the rate of change for the EHS Score before and after treatment sessions (change per two-month period) rate of change between -8 and 0 weeks versus rate of change between 0 and 16 weeks Visual analog scale for pain during treatment (score from 0 to 10) Week 4, Thursday or Friday The difference in the rate of change for the IIEF orgasmic function subdomain score before and after treatment sessions (change per two-month period) rate of change between -8 and 0 weeks versus rate of change between 0 and 16 weeks
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
🇫🇷Nîmes Cedex 09, France