MedPath

Effects of Different General Anesthesia Methods on Immune Responses in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Tongue Cancer

Not Applicable
Conditions
Tongue Cancer
Interventions
Procedure: intravenous anesthesia
Procedure: combined intravenous-inhalational anesthesia
Procedure: inhalational anesthesia
Registration Number
NCT01854021
Lead Sponsor
tiejun Zhang
Brief Summary

Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment for tongue cancer. However, surgery-induced immunosuppression has been implicated in the development of post-operative septic complications and neoplasm metastasis. General anesthesia is considered to not only suppress surgical stress, but also affect the immune function directly,such as altering the number and activity of immune cells. It is reported that some anesthetics increase susceptibility to tumor metastasis, apparently by suppressing natural killer cell activity. Different anesthetic techniques and anesthetics used in anesthesia have shown different effects on immunity. Many of the studies were animal trials or performed in vitro; in addition, most are focused on a single drug. To date, there is little published prospective clinical research designed specifically to investigate the effects of different general anesthetic technique on immune function in patients with oral malignant tumors. The aim of this study is going to characterize the immune response of patients undergoing surgery for tongue cancer under 3 types of general anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • All the patients were scheduled for elective surgery for tongue cancer under general anesthesia. None of the patients had a history of endocrine, immune and circulatory system diseases;
  • Exclusion criteria were also contraindications for receiving chemotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
  • contraindications for receiving chemotherapy,
  • receiving perioperative blood transfusion, or
  • preoperative and perioperative treatment with hormones and immunomodulatory agent.

Patients who suffered from any surgical complications such as infection were also excluded from our study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
intravenous anesthesiaintravenous anesthesiaintravenous anesthesia
combined intravenous-inhalational anesthesiacombined intravenous-inhalational anesthesiacombined intravenous-inhalational anesthesia
inhalational anesthesiainhalational anesthesiainhalational anesthesia
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentages of immune cells3 days

30 min before induction, 1 h, 3 h and 5 h after induction; at the end of operation and 24h, 48 h and 72 h after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentages of T lymphocytes subsets3 days

30 min before induction, 1 h, 3 h and 5 h after induction; at the end of operation and 24h, 48 h and 72 h after operation

Percentages of Natural Killer cells3 days

30 min before induction, 1 h, 3 h and 5 h after induction; at the end of operation and 24h, 48 h and 72 h after operation

Percentages of B lymphocytes3 days

30 min before induction, 1 h, 3 h and 5 h after induction; at the end of operation and 24h, 48 h and 72 h after operation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital of stomatology of wuhan university

🇨🇳

Wuhan, Hubei, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath