Effects of Different General Anesthesia Methods on Immune Responses in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Tongue Cancer
- Conditions
- Tongue Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: intravenous anesthesiaProcedure: combined intravenous-inhalational anesthesiaProcedure: inhalational anesthesia
- Registration Number
- NCT01854021
- Lead Sponsor
- tiejun Zhang
- Brief Summary
Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment for tongue cancer. However, surgery-induced immunosuppression has been implicated in the development of post-operative septic complications and neoplasm metastasis. General anesthesia is considered to not only suppress surgical stress, but also affect the immune function directly,such as altering the number and activity of immune cells. It is reported that some anesthetics increase susceptibility to tumor metastasis, apparently by suppressing natural killer cell activity. Different anesthetic techniques and anesthetics used in anesthesia have shown different effects on immunity. Many of the studies were animal trials or performed in vitro; in addition, most are focused on a single drug. To date, there is little published prospective clinical research designed specifically to investigate the effects of different general anesthetic technique on immune function in patients with oral malignant tumors. The aim of this study is going to characterize the immune response of patients undergoing surgery for tongue cancer under 3 types of general anesthesia.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- All the patients were scheduled for elective surgery for tongue cancer under general anesthesia. None of the patients had a history of endocrine, immune and circulatory system diseases;
- Exclusion criteria were also contraindications for receiving chemotherapy
- contraindications for receiving chemotherapy,
- receiving perioperative blood transfusion, or
- preoperative and perioperative treatment with hormones and immunomodulatory agent.
Patients who suffered from any surgical complications such as infection were also excluded from our study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description intravenous anesthesia intravenous anesthesia intravenous anesthesia combined intravenous-inhalational anesthesia combined intravenous-inhalational anesthesia combined intravenous-inhalational anesthesia inhalational anesthesia inhalational anesthesia inhalational anesthesia
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentages of immune cells 3 days 30 min before induction, 1 h, 3 h and 5 h after induction; at the end of operation and 24h, 48 h and 72 h after operation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentages of T lymphocytes subsets 3 days 30 min before induction, 1 h, 3 h and 5 h after induction; at the end of operation and 24h, 48 h and 72 h after operation
Percentages of Natural Killer cells 3 days 30 min before induction, 1 h, 3 h and 5 h after induction; at the end of operation and 24h, 48 h and 72 h after operation
Percentages of B lymphocytes 3 days 30 min before induction, 1 h, 3 h and 5 h after induction; at the end of operation and 24h, 48 h and 72 h after operation
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital of stomatology of wuhan university
🇨🇳Wuhan, Hubei, China