MedPath

Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using Mobile Technology in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Cryptogenic Stroke
Atrial Fibrillation
Registration Number
NCT05006105
Lead Sponsor
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the added value of mobile health (mHealth) to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) early in the care path of cryptogenic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients.

Detailed Description

The use of photoplethysmography (PPG)-based mHealth (with smartphone and smartwatch) is compared to the guideline-recommended insertable loop recorders (ILR) in the detection of AF in cryptogenic stroke or TIA patients.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
225
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA
  • The patient or its legal representative is willing to sign the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of AF or atrial flutter
  • Life expectancy of less than one year
  • Not qualified for ILR insertion
  • Indication or contraindication for permanent oral anticoagulants (OAC) at enrolment
  • Untreated hyperthyroidism
  • Myocardial infarction or coronary bypass grafting less than one month before the stroke onset
  • Presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and it is or was an indication to start OAC according to the European Stroke Organization guidelines
  • Inclusion in another clinical trial that will affect the objectives of this study
  • Not able to understand the Dutch language
  • Patient or partner not in possession of a smartphone

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
AF detection with mHealth versus ILR - PercentageAfter 6 months of having an ILR inserted and using mHealth.

Percentage of patients with AF detected

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
AF detection with mHealth versus ILR - DurationBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).

Duration of AF episodes

AF detection with ILR - PercentageAfter 12 months of having an ILR inserted.

Percentage of patients with AF detected

AF detection with mHealth versus ILR - Time to first AF detectionBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).

Time to first AF detection

AF detection with mHealth versus ILR - FrequencyBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).

Frequency of AF episodes

User experience and feeling of safety questionnaireAfter 6 months of having an ILR inserted and using mHealth.

Questionnaire with a 7 point Likert scale

Correlation between baseline characteristics and AF detectionBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).

Baseline characteristics include comorbidities, results of standard of care in-hospital stroke examinations and scores, relevant in-hospital therapy

Correlation between follow-up characteristics and AF detectionBaseline until end of study (after 12 months of having an ILR inserted).

Follow-up characteristics include changes in therapy, number of relevant readmissions, mortality and healthcare-related costs

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Ziekenhuist Oost-Limburg

🇧🇪

Genk, Limburg, Belgium

Jessa Hospital

🇧🇪

Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium

Ziekenhuist Oost-Limburg
🇧🇪Genk, Limburg, Belgium
David Verhaert, Dr.
Principal Investigator
Femke Wouters, MSc
Contact
femke.wouters@uhasselt.be
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath