NCT03602183CompletedNot Applicable
A Comparison of Direct vs. Video-laryngoscopes for Different Emergency Pediatric Airway Scenarios
Lazarski University2 sites in 1 country83 target enrollmentStarted: July 27, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 83
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Intubation time
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The effectiveness of endotracheal intubation in pre-hospital conditions is insufficient - especially in the context of pediatric patients. Anatomical differences in pediatric patients compared to adults: a relative larger tongue, a larger and more flabby epiglottis - located more cephalously - that make intubation is more difficult than for adults. Also, higher oxygen metabolism requires the immediate response of medical personnel to children in case of need to protect the airways and support breath.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Crossover
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •paramedics
- •give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- •none experience in videolaryngoscopy
- •less than 1 year experience in medicine
Exclusion Criteria
- •not meet the above criteria
- •wrist or low back diseases
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Intubation time
Time Frame: 1 day
time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt
Secondary Outcomes
- Success of intubation(1 day)
- Preferred ETI device(1 day)
- Cormack-Lehane grading(1 day)
- POGO score - percentage of glottic opening(1 day)
- Ease of use(1 day)
Investigators
Łukasz Szarpak
Associate Professor
Lazarski University
Study Sites (2)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct LaryngoscopyIntubationLaryngoscopyNCT04701762The Cleveland Clinic12,701
Completed
Not Applicable
Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-LaryngoscopeRespiratory FailureNCT01683526Beth Israel Medical Center117
Withdrawn
Phase 4
Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video LaryngoscopyRespiratory Distress SyndromeShockAcute Post-trauma Stress StateDrug ToxicityTrauma, Nervous SystemCardiac ArrestNCT01374061Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Novel Indirect Laryngoscopes to the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization.ImmobilizationNCT01032460University College Hospital Galway90
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Direct and Video Laryngoscope During Endotracheal Intubation in Sellick and Trendelenburg PositionDifficult IntubationNCT04457453Ajou University School of Medicine120