Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/NCT01683526
NCT01683526CompletedNot Applicable

Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation by Pulmonary Critical Care Physicians in Critically-Ill Patients Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope

Beth Israel Medical Center2 sites in 1 country117 target enrollmentStarted: August 2012Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
117
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
First Pass Success Rate
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaOutcomesInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The safety and efficacy of a video-laryngoscope as a primary intubation tool in urgent endotracheal intubation of critically-ill patients has not been well-described in the literature. This study will answer whether using a VL will impact on the efficacy and safety of intubation compared with a traditional direct laryngoscopy.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •All patients undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation by a pulmonary critical care medicine physician

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Difficult airway
  • •Oxygen saturation < 92% despite adequate mask ventilation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

First Pass Success Rate

Time Frame: From begining of intubation to verification. Less then 5 minutes approximatly

Secondary Outcomes

  • Severe Desaturation(For 10 minutes post intubation)
  • Cardiac Arrest(For 1 hour post intubation)
  • Hypotension(For 10 minutes post intubation)
  • Complications of Intubation(For 10 minutes post intubation)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Prehospital Intubation of COVID-19 Patient With Personal Protective EquipmentIntubation ComplicationSafety IssuesInfluenzaCardiac ArrestDifficult or Failed Intubation
NCT04365608Lazarski University90
Completed
Not Applicable
Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct LaryngoscopyIntubationLaryngoscopy
NCT04701762The Cleveland Clinic12,701
Completed
Not Applicable
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?Airway Management
NCT04850976Indonesia University62
Completed
Not Applicable
Pediatric Intubation During Emergency ConditionsEndotracheal IntubationPediatricInjuriesCardiac Arrest
NCT03602183Lazarski University83
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Success Rates of Video- vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Anesthesiology Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial" (The JuniorDoc-VL-Trial)Intubation ComplicationIntubation
NCT06360328University Hospital Heidelberg30
Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal... | Clinical Trial