Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT01683526
NCT01683526
Completed
Not Applicable

Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation by Pulmonary Critical Care Physicians in Critically-Ill Patients Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope

Beth Israel Medical Center1 site in 1 country117 target enrollmentAugust 2012
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsRespiratory Failure

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Respiratory Failure
Sponsor
Beth Israel Medical Center
Enrollment
117
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
First Pass Success Rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The safety and efficacy of a video-laryngoscope as a primary intubation tool in urgent endotracheal intubation of critically-ill patients has not been well-described in the literature. This study will answer whether using a VL will impact on the efficacy and safety of intubation compared with a traditional direct laryngoscopy.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2012
End Date
April 2013
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •All patients undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation by a pulmonary critical care medicine physician

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Difficult airway
  • •Oxygen saturation \< 92% despite adequate mask ventilation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

First Pass Success Rate

Time Frame: From begining of intubation to verification. Less then 5 minutes approximatly

Secondary Outcomes

  • Severe Desaturation(For 10 minutes post intubation)
  • Cardiac Arrest(For 1 hour post intubation)
  • Hypotension(For 10 minutes post intubation)
  • Complications of Intubation(For 10 minutes post intubation)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Prehospital Intubation of COVID-19 Patient With Personal Protective EquipmentIntubation ComplicationIntubation; Difficult or FailedCardiac ArrestInfluenzaSafety Issues
NCT04365608Lazarski University90
Completed
Not Applicable
Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct LaryngoscopyIntubationLaryngoscopy
NCT04701762The Cleveland Clinic12,701
Completed
Not Applicable
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?Airway Management
NCT04850976Indonesia University62
Completed
Not Applicable
Pediatric Intubation During Emergency ConditionsEndotracheal IntubationPediatricCardiac ArrestInjuries
NCT03602183Lazarski University83
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Success Rates of Video- vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Anesthesiology Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial" (The JuniorDoc-VL-Trial)Intubation ComplicationIntubation
NCT06360328University Hospital Heidelberg30