跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02526030
NCT02526030已完成4 期

Phase IV Study of Effectiveness of Aripiprazole, Quetiapine, and Ziprasidone in the Treatment of First Episode of Non-affective Psychosis Individuals Included in the First Episode Psychosis Clinical Program II (PAFIP II): a 3-year Follow-up

Fundación Marques de Valdecilla1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 203 人开始时间: 2008年10月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
203
试验地点
1
主要终点
Effectiveness of antipsychotics (percentage of discontinuation of the initially assigned treatment)

研究概览

简要总结

The selection of antipsychotic in early stages of the illness is mainly determined by its clinical effectiveness. Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are the first line drug treatment for individuals suffering from schizophrenia. It is clear that SGAs are not a homogeneous group and clinical effects and profile of side effects differ between SGAs. Differences among antipsychotics in terms of effectiveness have turned out to be a topic of increasing research interest, although comparisons between the different SGAs are scarce. In first episode of psychosis, SGAs have shown a higher treatment effectiveness compared to first generation antipsychotics (FGAs) (findings primarily driven by Haloperidol). Less evident seems to be the notion that some of the SGAs might be more effective (in terms of treatment discontinuation) than others. Most of the medium-term randomized studies have shown similar rates of all-cause treatment discontinuation in first episode patients treated with different SGAs. It may be concluded that more randomized controlled trails should be accomplished to determine the position of frequently used SGAs in clinical practice. Investigators undertook this study with the major objective of comparing the clinical effectiveness of three widely utilized SGAs (Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone and Quetiapine) in the acute treatment of first-episode non-affective psychosis individuals at 3 years of follow-up.

详细描述

Study setting and financial support: data for the present investigation were obtained from an ongoing epidemiological and three-year longitudinal intervention program of first-episode psychosis (PAFIP) conducted at the outpatient clinic and the inpatient unit at the University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Spain. Conforming to international standards for research ethics, this program was approved by the local institutional review board. Patients meeting inclusion criteria and their families provided written informed consent to be included in the PAFIP. The Mental Health Services of Cantabria provided funding for implementing the program. None pharmaceutical company supplied any financial support to it.

Study design: the severity scale of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive symptoms (SAPS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative symptoms (SANS) were used to evaluate symptomatology. To assess general adverse event experiences the Scale of the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU), the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) and the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) were used to assess side effects. The adverse events were evaluated using the UKU Side effect rating scale. Those treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred at a rate of at least 10% in either treatment group are considered. Treatment-emergent akathisia (BAS) and extrapyramidal symptoms (SARS) were assessed by both baseline-to-end changes and newly emergent categorical changes. The same trained psychiatrist (BC-F) completed all clinical assessments.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients followed in the First Episode Psychosis Clinical Program (PAFIP II) from October 2005 to January 2011.

排除标准

  • Meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for drug dependence
  • Meeting DSM-IV criteria for mental retardation
  • Having a history of neurological disease or head injury.

研究组 & 干预措施

Aripiprazole

Active Comparator

Oral, dose range 10-30 mg/day, once or twice a day, during study duration

干预措施: Aripiprazole (Drug)

Quetiapine

Active Comparator

Oral, dose range 100-600 mg/day, once or twice a day, during study duration

干预措施: Quetiapine (Drug)

Ziprasidone

Active Comparator

Oral, dose range 40-160 mg/day, once or twice a day, during study duration

干预措施: Ziprasidone (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Effectiveness of antipsychotics (percentage of discontinuation of the initially assigned treatment)

时间窗: 3 years

Two measures for evaluate the effectiveness of antipsychotics: * Percentage of discontinuation of the initially assigned treatment: patients who completed the 3 years follow-up assessment and changed initial antipsychotic. * Mean time to all-cause medication discontinuation. Four reasons for the discontinuation were recorded: 1.- insufficient efficacy; 2.- marked side-effects; 3.- patient reported non-adherence and 4.- other causes. If more than one reason for discontinuation was present, the most important reason according to the above ranking was selected. Antipsychotic treatment data (doses, discontinuation and concomitant medications) were registered every 6 months. Insufficient efficacy was established at the treating physician's judgment only after at least three weeks of treatment.

次要结局

  • Change in general psychopathology measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)(3 years)
  • Functional outcome measured by Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) and Global Assessment Functioning (GAF).(3 years)
  • Change in positive and negative symptoms measured by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative and Positive Symptoms (SANS and SAPS)(3 years)
  • Adherence to treatment measured by Morinsky questionnaire(3 years)

研究者

发起方
Fundación Marques de Valdecilla
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Benedicto Crespo-Facorro

Associate Professor of Psychiatry

Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验