The effect of robotic-assisted upper limb therapy on upper limb improvements following stroke
Recruiting
- Conditions
- StrokeStroke - IschaemicStroke - Haemorrhagic
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12609000777291
- Lead Sponsor
- Sharyn Chaplin
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
Diagnosis of stroke
No premorbid neurological deficits
Sufficient receptive and expressive language and cognitive ability to understand the study and provide consent
Sufficient sitting balance to use the robotic
Motor power grade of 3 or less in wrist flexion/extension and /or elbow pronation/supination.
Exclusion Criteria
Upper limb contractures
Significant increased tone (Modified Ashworth Scale =4)
Active arthritis in finger, elbow or wrist joints
Shoulder-hand syndrome
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Wolf Motor Function Test[At baseline, and immediately and 3 months after intervention ceases.]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fugl Meyer Assessment of Motor Function[At baseline, and immediately and 3 months after intervention ceases.];Active range of motion of wrist flexion and extension, and forearm supination and pronation - measured using a goniometer.[At baseline, and immediately and 3 months after intervention ceases.]