MedPath

A Comparison Between Surgical Techniques for Securing Conjunctival Autografting in Primary Pterygium Surgery

Not Applicable
Conditions
Pterygium
Interventions
Procedure: conjunctival autograft with fibrin glue
Procedure: sutureless and glue-free conjunctival autograft
Procedure: sutured conjunctival autograft
Registration Number
NCT03301974
Lead Sponsor
Assiut University
Brief Summary

Pterygium is a fibrovascular wing shaped encroachment of conjunctival fold on to the cornea with elastotic degeneration of a subconjunctival tissue, The standard treatment for pterygium is surgical excision, but the recurrence rate after surgery can be as high as 24%-89%, which compromises outcomes. Based on the simple excision of pterygium, multiple strategies and techniques have been developed to reduce the high rate of pterygium recurrence. The investigators aim was to compare the safety, efficacy, overall patient satisfaction and recurrence rate of suturing, fibrin gluing and sutureless glue-free technique for attaching conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium surgery.

Detailed Description

Design: Prospective randomized comparative interventional clinical study Setting: Assiut university hospital \& El-Mabarah hospital for health insurance Methods: The study included 60 eyes of 60 consecutive patients of primary nasal pterygium were enrolled in the study. Simple excision under local anesthesia was performed then closure of the bare sclera by conjunctival autograft with fibrin glue in 20 eyes of 20 patients (group 1), versus sutured free conjunctival autograft in 20 eyes of 20 patients (group 2) ), versus sutureless and glue-free conjunctival autograft in 20 eyes of 20 patients (group 3).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients complaining of primary Progressive nasal pterygium.
  2. Patients with pterygium threatening the visual axis.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Double head pterygium.
  2. Pseudopterygium
  3. Recurrent pterygium
  4. Patients with history of any bleeding abnormalities
  5. Patients with ocular surface diseases eg- blepharitis, Sjogren syndrome and dry eye.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
conjunctival autograft with fibrin glueconjunctival autograft with fibrin glueConjunctival autograft with fibrin glue done for patients of group 1 after pterygium excision
sutureless and glue-free conjunctival autograftsutureless and glue-free conjunctival autograftSutureless, glue-free conjunctival autograft done for patients of group 3 after pterygium excision
sutured conjunctival autograftsutured conjunctival autograftSutured conjunctival autograft done for patients of group 2 after pterygium excision
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recurrence Rate6 months postoperatively

The main postoperative primary outcomes measure the recurrence rate

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Postoperative discomfort1 day, 2 day, 1 week, 1 month 3 months and 6 months postoperatively

postoperative discomfort rated from 0 to 10 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Graft stability1 day, 2 day, 1 week, 1 month 3 months and 6 months postoperatively

postoperative Graft stability rated from grade 0 to 4 using a 5 point scale

Postoperative inflammation1 day, 2 day, 1 week, 1 month 3 months and 6 months postoperatively

postoperative inflammation rated from grade 0 to 4 using a 5 point scale

Complications1 day, 2 day, 1 week, 1 month 3 months and 6 months postoperatively

Complications recorded including, persistent epithelial defect, dellen, inclusion cyst, pyogenic granuloma, conjunctival edema, corneal scleral necrosis, infective scleritis, keratitis and endophthalmitis.

Overall patient satisfaction1 day, 2 day, 1 week, 1 month 3 months and 6 months postoperatively

Overall satisfaction with the procedure 4 weeks post-operatively will recorded as four grades 0= unsatisfied, 1= low satisfaction, 2= moderate satisfaction and 3= highly satisfied, the data were collected as mean scores and recorded. The three groups will compared for overall satisfaction.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath