Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05133362
NCT05133362TerminatedNot Applicable

Investigating Effects of Backward Gait Training With Exoskeleton on Gait Function, Balance and Depression Following Stroke and the Impact of Social Determinants of Health and Depression on Patients' Adherence to Physical Therapy

Alvernia University2 sites in 1 country9 target enrollmentStarted: August 25, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Enrollment
9
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Changes in Berg Balance Scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The proposed study aims to optimize patient outcomes and treatment intervention using a robotic exoskeleton in adults with cerebrovascular accidents (CVA, stroke) by investigating the following: AIM 1 is to investigate the effect of backward gait training with exoskeleton on motor function.

AIM 2 is to investigate the effect of backward gait training with exoskeleton on depression.

AIM 3 is to investigate the impact of social determinants of health and depression on patient adherence to physical therapy.

Detailed Description

Based on previous findings on backward gait training as well as the use of a wearable robotic exoskeleton in forward gait training, we hypothesize that backward gait training using exoskeleton leads to greater improvements in functional mobility, neuromuscular control and balance (AIM 1) and depression (AIM 2) in patients with stroke, when compared to standard of care, which includes forward gait training using exoskeleton. Findings from AIM 1 and 2 will provide novel evidence on the effects of backward gait training with exoskeleton in people with stroke and serve as a foundation for optimizing physical therapy protocols to improve motor functions and mental health. AIM 3 investigates the impact of social determinants of health and depression on patient adherence to physical therapy. Patient adherence (also called compliance) refers to the degree to which patients follow treatment recommendations prescribed by their health care provider.34 Even though patient adherence leads to positive treatment outcomes,35,36 it is affected by many factors, including patients' understanding of their disease and associated treatment (i.e., health literacy), social support, and depression.36-38 This experimental study employs a repeated measures design with participants randomly assigned to either a Standard Care with Ekso Group (SCG; control group, n=31) or a Standard Care with Ekso and Backward Walking Group (SCBWG; experimental group, n=31) in AIMs 1 and 2. AIMs 1 and 2 will be achieved using the group assignment as independent variables and motor function and depression as dependent variables. AIM 3 will be achieved using social determinants of health and depression as independent variables and patient adherence to physical therapy as an independent variable.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •18 years of age or older
  • •English or Spanish speaking
  • •A diagnosis first stroke (intracerebral hemorrhage or acute ischemic stroke)
  • •Referred to Reading Rehabilitation Hospital Outpatient Physical Therapy Clinic (hereafter referred to as outpatient PT)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Unable to follow 1-step commands
  • •> 220 pounds (100 kg)
  • •Height < 5'0" or > 6'4"
  • •Unable to take a few steps with assistance
  • •A score of > 42/56 on Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
  • •Severe cardiac disease (New York Heart Association Classification IV)
  • •Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth score > 3)
  • •Unstable spine or unhealed pelvic/limb fractures
  • •Active heterotrophic ossification impacting lower extremity range of motion
  • •Significant lower or upper extremity contractures
  • •Inability to achieve neutral ankle dorsiflexion with 12° of knee flexion
  • •Psychiatric or cognitive issues that could interfere with operating the exoskeleton
  • •Pregnancy
  • •Colostomy
  • •Poor skin integrity in areas in contact with the EksoNRTM
  • •Unresolved deep vein thrombosis
  • •Lower limb prosthesis or amputation
  • •Leg length discrepancies > 0.5 inches for upper legs, 0.75 inches for lower legs
  • •ROM restrictions preventing normal, reciprocal gait
  • •Inability to stand for > 60 seconds due to pain or orthostatic hypotension

Arms & Interventions

Standard Care with Ekso Group

Active Comparator

Participants in the SCG (n=31) will attend two 45-minute treatment sessions per week for a minimum of 8 and a maximum of 10 total sessions. For each participant, an individualized plan of care consistent with evidence-based practice standards will be provided based on rehabilitation goals. The interventions during each treatment session will include forward gait training with EksoNR, neuromuscular movement-related tasks, mobility tasks, and interventions using products and technology, and education for caregivers, family, and friends.

Intervention: Gait training with EksoNR (Device)

Standard Care with Ekso and Backward Walking Group

Experimental

Participants in the SCBWG (n=31) will attend two 45-minute treatment sessions per week for a minimum of 8 and a maximum of 10 total sessions. Once a week, each participant will receive standard care as described in the standard care with Ekso group.Once a week, each participant will receive backward walking training with EksoNR during their treatment session.

Intervention: Gait training with EksoNR (Device)

Standard Care with Ekso and Backward Walking Group

Experimental

Participants in the SCBWG (n=31) will attend two 45-minute treatment sessions per week for a minimum of 8 and a maximum of 10 total sessions. Once a week, each participant will receive standard care as described in the standard care with Ekso group.Once a week, each participant will receive backward walking training with EksoNR during their treatment session.

Intervention: Backward gait training with EksoNR (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changes in Berg Balance Scale

Time Frame: Baseline and within 1 week after the intervention

Changes from baseline static balance and fall risk at post-intervention. Berg Balance Scale ranges from 0 to 56, and a higher score indicates a better outcome (better balance and lower fall risk).

Changes in forward gait speed

Time Frame: Baseline and within 1 week after the intervention

Changes from baseline forward gait speed measured by 6-Minute Walk Test at post-intervention

Changes in Functional Ambulation Category

Time Frame: Baseline and within 1 week after the intervention

Changes from baseline ambulation ability at post-intervention. Functional Ambulation Category ranges from 0-5, and a higher score indicates a better outcome (greater independence in ambulation).

Changes in Patient Health Questionnaire-9

Time Frame: Baseline and within 1 week after the intervention

Changes from baseline depressive symptoms at post-intervention. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 ranges from 0 to 27, and a higher score indicates a worse outcome (greater depressive symptoms).

Changes in backward gait speed

Time Frame: Baseline and within 1 week after the intervention

Changes from baseline backward gait speed measured by 3-Meter Backwards Walk Test at post-intervention

Changes in reciprocal activities in antagonistic muscles measured by Electromyography

Time Frame: Baseline and within 1 week after the intervention

Changes from baseline neuromuscular control of leg muscles at post-intervention. A greater reciprocity between leg antagonistic muscles indicate a better outcome.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Soo Yeon Sun, PT, PhD

Assistant Professor

Alvernia University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials