MedPath

A comparative study between Whitfields ointment + Oral fluconazole Vs 1% butenafine in tinea infections of ski

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Health Condition 1: null- Tinea infections of skin
Registration Number
CTRI/2012/08/002914
Lead Sponsor
Department of Pharmacology and Department of Skin and VD CU Shah Medical College and Hospital
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria

New patients attending skin O.P.D.

Exclusion Criteria

1) Follow up cases

2) pregnant or lactating women,

3) patients having allergy to topical imidazole or any other antifungals used in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. Change in baseline sign and symptoms score <br/ ><br>2. Change in Physicianâ??s Global Evaluation Response <br/ ><br>b. Safety (No. of ADRs developed & percentage of the participants developing ADRs) <br/ ><br>c. Cost effectiveness (Incremental cost and Incremental effectiveness) <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: <br/ ><br>one month
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. Assessment of clinico mycological correlation <br/ ><br>2.Comparison of relapse rate with both the treatments <br/ ><br>3.To identify and find the prevalence of different species of tinea <br/ ><br>Timepoint: one month
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath