JPRN-UMIN000018989CompletedPhase 2
A comparative study to assess the safety and efficacy of underwater EMR for intermediate size (10-20 mm) colorectal polyps. - UEMR vs C-EMR study
Osaka international cancer institute0 sites230 target enrollmentStarted: September 12, 2015Last updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 230
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20years-old to ot applicable (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- •1)pedunculated polyp 2)residual lesions after EMR 3)patients with marked electrolyte abnormality 4)patients with hematological abnormality 5)patients with severe organ failure 6) patients with inflammatory bowel disease and polyposis 7) patients who have been judged as inappropriate for this study
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
se of Baska mask versus Ambu-aura gain in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia : A comparative study.CTRI/2022/07/044255Dr Shalini A
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Safety of Etoricoxib and Piroxicam oral drugs in Osteoarthritis patients at Rama hospital KanpurCTRI/2022/12/047816PRINC BGHEA
Completed
Phase 4
A comparative study between Whitfields ointment + Oral fluconazole Vs 1% butenafine in tinea infections of skiCTRI/2012/08/002914Department of Pharmacology and Department of Skin and VD CU Shah Medical College and Hospital120
Completed
Phase 4
A comparative study between 2% Sertaconazole vs topical 1% Butenafine in tinea infections of skiCTRI/2012/06/002714Department of Pharmacology and Department of Skin and VD CU Shah Medical College and Hospital125
Recruiting
Phase 4
A study to evaluate cost effectiveness and safety of pain killers with and without acid reducing drugs in patients having pain in knee.CTRI/2013/05/003618DrMehwishmajeed94