Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Comparing Two Techniques
- Conditions
- AC Joint Dislocation
- Interventions
- Procedure: Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction
- Registration Number
- NCT03887234
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Turku
- Brief Summary
This study follows early wound healing using knot hiding titanium implants in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. A further aim is to compare two techniques where the semitendinosus tendon graft either runs through the coracoid drill hole or goes around the coracoid.
- Detailed Description
A modified arthroscopic technique for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction was used based on a previous technique where the supportive device and the semi tendon graft share the clavicular and coracoid drill holes. A notable problem with the previous technique was large protruding suture knots on the washer and clavicle, which could predispose to wound infection. In this new modified technique, new implants were introduced. The new implant hides the suture knot and less foreign material is needed.
The purpose of this study is to follow the patients operated using the new implants with special attention to early clavicular wound healing. A further aim is to compare a technique where the semitendinosus graft runs through clavicular and coracoid drill holes versus a technique where the graft runs under the coracoid process.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 27
Clinical diagnosis of chronic acromioclavicular luxation
Severe new trauma after the treatment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Around the coracoid Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction The semitendinosus tendon graft goes around the coracoid. Through the coracoid Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction The semitendinosus tendon graft goes through the 4.5 mm coracoid drill hole.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total number of wound infections in the clavicular describing the safety of the used implant two months Clinical sign questionnaire, scale 0-1 (no-yes)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clavicular tunnel diameter The measure is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up Describes possible adverse expansion of the tunnel; millimeters
Coracoclavicular distance The measure is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up Describes possible adverse increase of the coracoclavicular distance; millimeters
Simple shoulder test, scale 0-12, 12 denoting excellent Score is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up General shoulder test; describes the general state of the shoulder
Nottingham clavicle score, scale 20-100, 100 denoting excellent Score is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up AC joint specific test; describes the state of the AC joint and clavicle
Constant score, scale 0-100, 100 denoting excellent Score is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up General shoulder test; describes the general state of the shoulder
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Paavo Nurmi Centre, University of Turku
🇫🇮Turku, Finland