MedPath

Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Comparing Two Techniques

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
AC Joint Dislocation
Interventions
Procedure: Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction
Registration Number
NCT03887234
Lead Sponsor
University of Turku
Brief Summary

This study follows early wound healing using knot hiding titanium implants in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. A further aim is to compare two techniques where the semitendinosus tendon graft either runs through the coracoid drill hole or goes around the coracoid.

Detailed Description

A modified arthroscopic technique for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction was used based on a previous technique where the supportive device and the semi tendon graft share the clavicular and coracoid drill holes. A notable problem with the previous technique was large protruding suture knots on the washer and clavicle, which could predispose to wound infection. In this new modified technique, new implants were introduced. The new implant hides the suture knot and less foreign material is needed.

The purpose of this study is to follow the patients operated using the new implants with special attention to early clavicular wound healing. A further aim is to compare a technique where the semitendinosus graft runs through clavicular and coracoid drill holes versus a technique where the graft runs under the coracoid process.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
27
Inclusion Criteria

Clinical diagnosis of chronic acromioclavicular luxation

Exclusion Criteria

Severe new trauma after the treatment

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Around the coracoidCoracoclavicular ligament reconstructionThe semitendinosus tendon graft goes around the coracoid.
Through the coracoidCoracoclavicular ligament reconstructionThe semitendinosus tendon graft goes through the 4.5 mm coracoid drill hole.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total number of wound infections in the clavicular describing the safety of the used implanttwo months

Clinical sign questionnaire, scale 0-1 (no-yes)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clavicular tunnel diameterThe measure is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up

Describes possible adverse expansion of the tunnel; millimeters

Coracoclavicular distanceThe measure is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up

Describes possible adverse increase of the coracoclavicular distance; millimeters

Simple shoulder test, scale 0-12, 12 denoting excellentScore is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up

General shoulder test; describes the general state of the shoulder

Nottingham clavicle score, scale 20-100, 100 denoting excellentScore is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up

AC joint specific test; describes the state of the AC joint and clavicle

Constant score, scale 0-100, 100 denoting excellentScore is taken postoperatively and after two years follow-up

General shoulder test; describes the general state of the shoulder

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Paavo Nurmi Centre, University of Turku

🇫🇮

Turku, Finland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath