MedPath

The General Use of Robots in Stroke Recovery: the Anklebot

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Device: seated robot-assisted ankle therapy
Registration Number
NCT02249832
Lead Sponsor
Northwell Health
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if isolated robot-assisted training of the ankle joint improves chronic hemiparetic gait in patients after stroke.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
55
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years of age or older
  • First single focal unilateral lesion with diagnosis verified by brain imaging, which occurred at least 6 months prior
  • Cognitive function sufficient enough to understand experiments and follow instructions
  • Some amount of independent ambulation (with orthoses or walker)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Botox treatment within 6-weeks of enrollment;
  • Fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb;
  • Complete and total flaccid paralysis of all lower extremity motor function;
  • Unable to ambulate except with the aid of another person

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
seated robot-assisted ankle therapyseated robot-assisted ankle therapyAll participants received eighteen 1 hour sessions (3x/week for 6 weeks) of seated robot-assisted ankle training with the MIT anklebot. Upon analysis, subjects were stratified based on average admission gait speed on the 10 Meter Walk Test at comfortable pace according to clinically established gait speed performance groups: low (\<0.4m/sec), moderate (0.4m/sec-0.8m/sec) and high (\>0.8m/sec) functioning.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change From Baseline in Gait Speed (m/Sec) on the 10 Meter Walk Test at Comfortable Pace.baseline, discharge (week 6), 3 month FU (overall week 18)

Subjects were stratified based on average admission gait speed on the 10 Meter Walk Test at comfortable pace according to clinically established gait speed performance groups: low (\<0.4m/sec), moderate (0.4m/sec-0.8m/sec) and high (\>0.8m/sec) functioning. Mean gait speeds on the 10m Walk Test at comfortable pace (m/sec) were then compared across these three groups (low, moderate, and high function) at three timepoints (baseline, discharge (week 6), and 3 month FU (overall week 18)).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change From Baseline in Gait Speed (m/Sec) on the 10 Meter Walk Test at Fast Pace.baseline, discharge (week 6), 3 month FU (overall week 18)

Subjects were stratified based on average admission gait speed on the 10 Meter Walk Test at comfortable pace according to clinically established gait speed performance groups: low (\<0.4m/sec), moderate (0.4m/sec-0.8m/sec) and high (\>0.8m/sec) functioning. Mean gait speeds on the 10m Walk Test at fast pace (m/sec) were then compared across these three groups (low, moderate, and high function) at three timepoints (baseline, discharge (week 6), and 3 month FU (overall week 18)).

Mean Change From Baseline in Distance Walked (Meters) on the 6 Minute Walk Test at Comfortable Pace.baseline, discharge (week 6), 3 month FU (overall week 18)

Subjects were stratified based on average admission gait speed on the 10 Meter Walk Test at comfortable pace according to clinically established gait speed performance groups: low (\<0.4m/sec), moderate (0.4m/sec-0.8m/sec) and high (\>0.8m/sec) functioning. Mean distance walked (m) on the 6 Minute Walk test at comfortable pace were then compared across these three groups (low, moderate, and high function) at three timepoints (baseline, discharge (week 6), and 3 month FU (overall week 18)).

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

🇺🇸

Manhasset, New York, United States

Transitions of Long Island Outpatient Rehabilitation

🇺🇸

Manhasset, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath