MedPath

Prospective Evaluation of Lingual Frenotomy in Newborns With Simultaneous Lip Tie for the Relief of Breastfeeding Pain.

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Enlarged Labial Frenum
Ankyloglossia
Breast Feeding
Interventions
Procedure: Lingual Frenotomy
Procedure: Labial Frenotomy
Procedure: Sham Procedure
Registration Number
NCT02141243
Lead Sponsor
University of South Florida
Brief Summary

We are proposing to conduct a randomized, controlled trial of newborns in the maternal infant care areas at Tampa General Hospital. Participants who are determined eligible for the study (classified to have ankyloglossia via the HATLFF and either a Class III or IV maxillary labial frenum) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A or Group B. Group A will receive a sham procedure for intervention #1 and a lingual frenotomy procedure for intervention #2. Group B will receive a lingual frenotomy procedure for intervention #1 and a sham procedure for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy, and breastfeeding will be monitored afterwards.

Detailed Description

The study is a randomized control studies which aims to contribute data to a previous study on the effects of ankyloglossia (tongue-tie) on breastfeeding, and to also provide new information on the effects of maxillary lip-tie on breastfeeding. Participants who are determined eligible for the study (classified to have ankyloglossia via the HATLFF and either a Class III or IV maxillary labial frenum) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A or Group B. Group A will receive a sham procedure for intervention #1 and a lingual frenotomy procedure for intervention #2. Group B will receive a lingual frenotomy procedure for intervention #1 and a sham procedure for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy, and breastfeeding will be monitored afterwards. These results will be analyzed to determine when lingual frenotomies, labial frenotomies, or both are necessary to improve breastfeeding pain and LATCH scores.

The study aims to prove that the simple and low risk frenotomy procedure should be considered as treatment for both ankyloglossia and maxillary lip-tie, preventing breastfeeding complications as well as many other future problems such as with speech and self esteem. It is hypothesized that the use of frenotomies as treatment for ankyloglossia and maxillary lip-tie will improve breastfeeding success for breastfeeding couplets with newborns with both ankyloglossia and maxillary lip-tie. It is expected to see an increase in LATCH score to \>7 for breastfeeding sessions and a significant decrease in scoring on the pain scale after frenotomy intervention, while it is expected to see little change in LATCH and pain scale assessment scores after sham procedures. Overall data is not expected to vary significantly between Group A and Group B. It is also hypothesized that a lingual frenotomy alone will be sufficient to improve breastfeeding success without the need to also conduct a labial frenotomy.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Newborn is full term (at least 37 weeks) and otherwise in good health.
  2. Newborn exhibits having ankyloglossia (score of less than 11 with failing lactation management or an appearance score lower than 8, based on HATLFF) and a Class III or Class IV maxillary lip-tie, simultaneously.
  3. Mother of newborn noted to have nipple pain or difficulty with breastfeeding (LATCH score of <7).
  4. Mother of newborn has intention to exclusively breastfeed newborn.
  5. Mother of newborn signs a written informed consent for treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Premature newborns.
  2. Newborns older than 2 weeks.
  3. Newborns with craniofacial anomalies (i.e. cleft lip or palate).
  4. Newborns who are neurologically compromised.
  5. Mother has condition that could affect the milk supply (i.e diabetes).
  6. Mother of newborn is not English speaking and not able to read at least at a 6th grade level.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group ALingual FrenotomyAll participants will receive both the lingual frenotomy and sham procedure. Group A infants will receive lingual frenotomy for intervention #1 and a sham procedure for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy. Lingual frenotomy: tongue will be elevated, expose frenulum with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators, and then incise frenulum tissue with a straight scissor. Sham/placebo procedure: infant brought into a procedure room and kept there for as long as the average experimental procedure would take (\~5 minutes). Maxillary labial frenotomy: 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area, upper lip lifted, frenum stretched, and a laser, (iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm) or scissors, will be used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.
Group ASham ProcedureAll participants will receive both the lingual frenotomy and sham procedure. Group A infants will receive lingual frenotomy for intervention #1 and a sham procedure for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy. Lingual frenotomy: tongue will be elevated, expose frenulum with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators, and then incise frenulum tissue with a straight scissor. Sham/placebo procedure: infant brought into a procedure room and kept there for as long as the average experimental procedure would take (\~5 minutes). Maxillary labial frenotomy: 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area, upper lip lifted, frenum stretched, and a laser, (iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm) or scissors, will be used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.
Group ALabial FrenotomyAll participants will receive both the lingual frenotomy and sham procedure. Group A infants will receive lingual frenotomy for intervention #1 and a sham procedure for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy. Lingual frenotomy: tongue will be elevated, expose frenulum with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators, and then incise frenulum tissue with a straight scissor. Sham/placebo procedure: infant brought into a procedure room and kept there for as long as the average experimental procedure would take (\~5 minutes). Maxillary labial frenotomy: 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area, upper lip lifted, frenum stretched, and a laser, (iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm) or scissors, will be used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.
Group BLingual FrenotomyAll participating infants will receive both the lingual frenotomy and sham procedure. Group B infants will receive the sham procedure for intervention #1 and a lingual frenotomy for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy. Sham/placebo procedure: infant brought into a procedure room and kept there for as long as the average experimental procedure would take (\~5 minutes). Lingual frenotomy: tongue will be elevated, expose frenulum with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators, and then incise frenulum tissue with a straight scissor. Maxillary labial frenotomy: 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area, upper lip lifted, frenum stretched, and an iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm laser used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.
Group BSham ProcedureAll participating infants will receive both the lingual frenotomy and sham procedure. Group B infants will receive the sham procedure for intervention #1 and a lingual frenotomy for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy. Sham/placebo procedure: infant brought into a procedure room and kept there for as long as the average experimental procedure would take (\~5 minutes). Lingual frenotomy: tongue will be elevated, expose frenulum with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators, and then incise frenulum tissue with a straight scissor. Maxillary labial frenotomy: 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area, upper lip lifted, frenum stretched, and an iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm laser used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.
Group BLabial FrenotomyAll participating infants will receive both the lingual frenotomy and sham procedure. Group B infants will receive the sham procedure for intervention #1 and a lingual frenotomy for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy. Sham/placebo procedure: infant brought into a procedure room and kept there for as long as the average experimental procedure would take (\~5 minutes). Lingual frenotomy: tongue will be elevated, expose frenulum with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators, and then incise frenulum tissue with a straight scissor. Maxillary labial frenotomy: 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area, upper lip lifted, frenum stretched, and an iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm laser used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scaleafter breastfeeding before intervention #1, after breastfeeding after intervention #1, after breastfeeding after intervention #2, and during 1 week follow-up (also after intervention #3 if applicable)

This visual pain analog scale is used to measure breastfeeding pain experienced by the mother.

Change in LATCH scoreafter breastfeeding before intervention #1, after breastfeeding after intervention #1, after breastfeeding after intervention #2, and during 1 week follow-up (also after intervention #3 if applicable)

Latch, Audible swallowing, Type of nipple, Comfort, and Hold (LATCH) Breastfeeding Quality Assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Tampa General Hospital

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath