MedPath

Training in Shared Decision-making of Cystic Fibrosis Centers Competences in the Treatment of CF Related Diabetes in Adult Patients

Conditions
Diabetes
Cystic Fibrosis
Interventions
Other: Shared decision making
Registration Number
NCT04891159
Lead Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Brief Summary

Diabetes affects half of cystic fibrosis patients aged 30 years and older. It develops asymptomatically for a long time. Also, two options are possible: start insulin treatment now with the additional constraints associated with cystic fibrosis or wait while monitoring the patient's clinical status and initiate insulin treatment when he has developed symptoms and therefore later. In practice, the choice between these two options takes place over two medical consultations without a formalized shared decision-making process between the doctor and the patient.

Shared decision-making is a decision-making process in which the healthcare provider and the patient learn about patients care options and then deliberate to reach a common agreement on the decision taken.

Shared decision-making seemed particularly relevant to us in cystic fibrosis where there are complex treatment options with variable short-, medium- and long-term side effects and where the disease and its treatments have a high impact on the patient's quality of life.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria

Concerning the patient :

  • Patient major
  • Patient affected by cystic fibrosis
  • Patient able to understand french
  • Patient sable on Respiratory and nutritional status
  • Patient with disorders of carbohydrate metabolism in the glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
  • Patient with normal fasting blood sugar

Concerning the health professionals :

Medical and paramedical professionals practising in the adult Cystic Fibrosis Centers Competences (doctors, nurses, dieticians, psychologists, physiotherapists, etc...)

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient with transplant
  • Patient who have received insulin therapy
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Shared decision makingShared decision makingDuring the first consultation (V1), the doctor will present the patient on the therapeutic treatment information related to diabetes according to the shared decision making (options, benefits, risks) with the assistance of decision support tools. The decision-making visit will take place after a reflection period of 8 to 15 days after V1. A discussion based on the feedback from this period of reflection will take place between the two actors and either there is a common agreement on the decision taken (shared decision-making), or the decision is taken by the patient, or the decision is made by the physician at the request of the patient. A social sciences and humanities methodologist will attend each consultation, onsite or in videoconferencing. After the consultation, he realized a semi-structured interview with the patient. During this interview, the patient filled the self-administered questionnaires: SDM-Q-9, SURE, CollaboRATE, Spielberger test and the research team questionnaire
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adoption of a shared decision making measured by the total score obtained on the 9 items of the shared decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), translated into French.The principal endpoint is measured for interventional group : immediately after the second consultation, for control group : immediately after the consultation where the treatment decision is taken (consultation 1 or 2)

The SDM-Q-9 is a self-administered questionnaire of 9 items coded on a 6-point Likert scale. A total score between 0 and 45 is calculated from the sum of the scores obtained for the 9 questions. This score is converted between 0 and 100 by multiplying by a factor of 20/9, 0 indicating a non adoption of shared decision making as perceived by the patient and conversely 100 indicating an adoption of shared decision making as perceived by the patient. The total score will be described in each group by mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles and extent, and will be compared between the 2 groups with a non-parametric Wilcoxon test.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

CRCM Grenoble adulte - H么pital Albert Michallon

馃嚝馃嚪

La Tronche, France

CRCM Montpellier Mixte - H么pital Arnaud de Villeneuve

馃嚝馃嚪

Montpellier, France

CRCM Lyon adulte - Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud

馃嚝馃嚪

Pierre-B茅nite, France

CRCM Rennes adulte - H么pital Pontchaillou

馃嚝馃嚪

Rennes, France

漏 Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath