A study to compare different methods of giving Inhaled Anaesthetic Agents with an intent to minimise wastage
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/11/060003
- Lead Sponsor
- one
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Elective Surgery
GA with Endotracheal intubation with Sevoflurane
ASA I and II
Exclusion Criteria
Anticipated Difficult airway
Rapid sequence intubation
Haemodynamic instability
Chronic lung/ kidney/ heart disease
Those requiring flows more than 6 l/min for successful bag and mask ventilation
More than one attempt in intubation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time (in seconds) required to reach 1 MAC after reconnection of circuit in each groupTimepoint: Intraoperative Period
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Amount of oxygen wastage: Duration of disconnection in minutes multiplied by the Flow in liters per minTimepoint: Intraoperative period;Comparison of satisfaction regarding FGF off & standby technique (Likert scale 1-5), from the anesthesiologists & trainees after being exposed to the two interventionsTimepoint: After Exposure to the intervention in intraoperative period;Open ended question on any other opinion & feedback regarding the 2 new interventions proposed, from the anaesthesiologists & trainees <br/ ><br>Timepoint: After exposure to intervention in intraoperative period;Time to reach one MAC in subgroups: Intubation duration more than 30 sec & intubation duration less than 30 sec <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Intraoperative Period