Clinical Evaluation of Four Aesthetic Restorations in Non-carious Cervical Lesions: a Randomised Controlled Split-mouth Clinical Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Noncarious Cervical Lesions
- Sponsor
- Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- evaluation of restoration on cervical lesions
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
To compare the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer, flowable composite, bulkfill composite and nanohybrid composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).
Detailed Description
One hundred fourty NCCLs were randomised into four groups according to a split-mouth design. Clinical evaluations will be performed after 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Investigators
Gul Yildiz Telatar
Principal Investigator
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •had at least four non-carious symmetrical cervical lesions,
- •had permanent dentition and were older than 20 years old,
- •had cervical margins in dentin
Exclusion Criteria
- •periodontal disease
- •pregnant or breastfeeding
- •being under orthodontic therapy
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
evaluation of restoration on cervical lesions
Time Frame: 6 months
According to FDI criteria (aesthetic, biological and fuctional) score 1, clinically very good; score 2, clinically good; score 3, clinically sufficient; score 4, clinically unsatisfactory; score 5, clinically poor. Scores 1-3 show clinically acceptable restoration, while scores 4 and 5 indicate failure