Esthetic and Clinical Assessment of Injectable Resin Composite Technique Compared to Conventional Layering Technique in Patients With Multiple Spacing in the Maxillary Anterior Teeth Area.
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Clinical Performance
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 20
- Primary Endpoint
- Change from baseline in Esthetic anatomical form at 6,12,18& 24 months.
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
injectable resin composite technique will show a better clinical and esthetic performance compared to conventional layering resin composite technique in patients with multiple spacing in the maxillary anterior teeth area or not.
Detailed Description
The injectable composite resin technique is an indirect/direct method that uses a transparent silicone index for accurate and predictable translation of diagnostic wax-up into composite restorations without the need for tooth preparation. The injection molding technique has the advantage of replicating the excellent anatomy defined by a lab-made diagnostic wax-up whereby it would be used for the fabrication of direct restorations, so excellent anatomy results, verifies aesthetics, phonetics, and occlusion, avoids misunderstandings, as it is easy to implement and repair.
Investigators
Tasneem Mokhtar Ali Morad
Principle investigator
Cairo University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Sound and vital upper anterior teeth.
- •Spacing in the maxillary anterior teeth area ranging from .5mm to 2mm.
- •Minor misalignment, correction of peg laterals.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Non-vital, fractured, or cracked teeth.
- •Teeth with caries or in need of replacement of existing restorations.
- •Rampant caries, atypical extrinsic staining of teeth.
- •Heavy occlusion and occlusal contacts or history of bruxism.
- •Severe periodontal affection.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change from baseline in Esthetic anatomical form at 6,12,18& 24 months.
Time Frame: T1: Baseline. T2: 6 months. T3: 12 months. T4: 18 months. T5: 24 months.
FDI criteria. Possible scores range from 1 (Excellent) to 5 (Immediate replacement necessary).
Secondary Outcomes
- Change from baseline in Color match and translucency at 6,12,18& 24 months.(T1: Baseline. T2: 6 months. T3: 12 months. T4: 18 months. T5: 24 months.)
- Change from baseline in Surface and marginal staining at 6,12,18& 24 months.(T1: Baseline. T2: 6 months. T3: 12 months. T4: 18 months. T5: 24 months.)
- Change from baseline in Surface lustrous at 6,12,18& 24 months.(T1: Baseline. T2: 6 months. T3: 12 months. T4: 18 months. T5: 24 months.)