Chronic Pain and Amputation: A Quality of Life Comparison
- Conditions
- Chronic PainAmputation
- Registration Number
- NCT06704386
- Lead Sponsor
- Kastamonu University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this observational, cross-sectional study is to investigate and compare the impact of chronic pain and amputation on patients' quality of life. By excluding individuals with conditions that might influence quality of life, the study seeks to provide insights into how these two conditions affect physical and emotional well-being. Statistical methods will be employed to analyze the data. The primary research questions are as follows:
Is the quality of life of individuals with chronic pain lower than that of those with an amputation? Is the quality of life of individuals with chronic pain higher than that of those with an amputation? Is the quality of life of individuals with chronic pain similar to that of those with an amputation?
- Detailed Description
Chronic pain is a common, complex, and distressing public health issue that significantly impacts both individuals and society, affecting more than 30% of the global population. Each year, 1 in 10 people develop chronic pain, making it one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. It is also one of the primary reasons patients seek medical care. The economic burden of chronic pain rivals that of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Chronic pain is a multidimensional health problem, influencing every aspect of patients' lives. It contributes to loss of function and is accompanied by physical, emotional, cognitive, psychosocial, and motivational challenges. Additionally, it is associated with reduced activity levels, impaired functionality, and a significant decline in quality of life.
Amputation, on the other hand, is a major trauma that results in profound changes to body structure and function, substantially affecting an individual's quality of life, both socially and professionally. It creates barriers to reintegration into work and social life, limiting active participation in society. Amputation has far-reaching impacts on quality of life, including body image concerns, loss of a sense of integrity, decreased self-esteem, a distorted body image, feelings of emptiness and worthlessness, difficulties with social adjustment, reduced sexual activity, anxiety, depression, social discomfort, and challenges in relationships and marriage.
Health is defined as a state of complete physical, social, and spiritual well-being. Both chronic pain and amputation impair individuals' health status due to limitations in physical and social functioning, mental health challenges, pain, and reduced health-related quality of life. While numerous studies have explored the quality of life associated with each condition, no study has directly compared the quality of life between individuals with chronic pain and those who have undergone amputation.
The aim of this study is to compare the quality of life of individuals with chronic pain to that of amputees, providing valuable insights into the unique and overlapping challenges faced by these patient groups.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 56
- Being 18 years old or older
- Having adequate Turkish reading and understanding skills
- Having pain for more than 3 months (for patients with chronic pain)
- At least 1 year having passed since the amputation (for patients with amputatiton)
- Having additional diseases such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, arthrosis, and psychiatric disorders, which could limit their physical and emotional status, so the quality of life
- Pregnancy Experiencing pain due to malignancy (for patients with chronic pain)
- Congenital amputation and chronic pain (for patients with amputatition)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Short Form -36 (SF-36) From November 14 to December 17 The SF-36 is one of the most widely used generic tools for measuring quality of life.This scale evaluates eight health dimensions across 36 items: physical function, role limitations (due to physical and emotional problems), social function, mental health, vitality (energy), pain, and general health perception.
The SF-36 offers several advantages, including its ability to assess both the positive and negative aspects of a health condition in just five minutes.It also demonstrates superior sensitivity in detecting subtle changes in disability compared to other scales. Instead of providing a single score, the SF-36 generates separate scores for each subscale, ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 100 indicates excellent health, while a score of 0 reflects poor health.
It has been validated and found reliable in Turkish and is recommended for use across all physical disease groups to assess quality of life comprehensively.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Baskent University Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Training Center
🇹🇷Adana, Turkey