MedPath

Quality of Life of TEP vs Lichtenstein Hernioplasty

Not Applicable
Conditions
Inguinal Hernia
Interventions
Procedure: Laparoscopic TEP Hernioplasty
Procedure: Open Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
Registration Number
NCT02723045
Lead Sponsor
Sarawak General Hospital
Brief Summary

To determine if there is a difference in the quality of life in between patients who undergoes laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) or modified Lichtenstein hernioplasty

Detailed Description

Patients presenting with reducible inguinal hernias will be randomized between open or laparoscopic repair groups. The primary outcome will be the quality of life scores. Patients will be followed-up for 12 months.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Both genders
  • Unilateral inguinal hernias
  • Reducible inguinal hernias
  • Elective setting

Exclusion Criteria

  • ASA Physical Status (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) Grade > 2
  • Recurrence
  • Inguinal-scrotal hernias
  • Prostatectomy, Pfannenstiel incision, previous pre-peritoneal surgery
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal for general anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repairLaparoscopic TEP HernioplastyPatients will undergo laparoscopic repair of their inguinal hernias
Open modified Lichtenstein repairOpen Lichtenstein HernioplastyPatients will undergo open repair of their inguinal hernias
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of life12 months

Carolina Comfort Scale

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Operating time12 months
Complications12 monthts
Duration of hospitalization12 months
Recurrence12 months

Recurrence of hernia after repair

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath