CTRI/2022/02/040435
Not yet recruiting
未知
Comparison of efficacy of C MAC D blade with Macintosh blade for orotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised control trial
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- St Johns Medical college
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA class I and II
- •Patients undergoing surgery under general anaethesia requiring orotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with anticipated difficult airway
- •Patients with cervical spine injury or instability
- •Patients with musculoskeletal disorders
- •Surgeries involving anticipated risk of aspiration
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison of two different types of devices for inserting tube in the wind pipe in patients with restricted mouth opening.CTRI/2022/03/041218AIIMS New Delhi
Completed
Not Applicable
A randomised controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer.Health Condition 1: null- american society of anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2CTRI/2017/03/008103rajiv gandhi cancer institute and research centre300
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison equipments bougie versus stylet using video laryngoscope during intubation without neck movementsCTRI/2020/09/027672IRENJEN S M
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison between 2 different video laryngoscope blades.CTRI/2021/06/034094Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Pondicherry
Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of C-MAC D-Blade and Airtraq Video laryngoscope(2 different devices) for putting tube in trachea for giving anaesthesia after applying cervical collarCTRI/2021/10/037394Intramural Grant AIIMS