MedPath

Efficiency and Safety of Pleural Biopsy Methods in the Diagnosis of Pleural Diseases

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Medical Thoracoscopy
Diagnosis of Pleural Diseases
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: CT-guided Abrams needle biopsy, US-guided cutting needle, medical thoracoscopy
Registration Number
NCT03153501
Lead Sponsor
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
Brief Summary

Image-guided pleural biopsies, both ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) guided, and medical thoracoscopy are important in the diagnosis of pleural disease. However, no consensus exists regarding which biopsy methods are appropriate for specific procedures.

In this prospective study, the investigators aimed to compare CT-scan guided pleural biopsy using an Abrams' needle (CT-ANPB) with US-assisted pleural biopsy using a cutting needle (US-CNPB)and medical thoracoscopy with respect to both diagnostic yield and safety.

Detailed Description

The primary end point of this study was the determination of the sensitivity and the complication rates of the invasive methods, Abrams needle pleural biopsy, tru-cut needle pleural biopsy, medical thoracoscopy with respect to the diagnosis of pleural disease.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
164
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with pleural diseases
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with other lung diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Diagnostic armCT-guided Abrams needle biopsy, US-guided cutting needle, medical thoracoscopyPatients with pleural diseases; malignant pleural diseases, tuberculous pleurisy, and other exudate required CT-guided Abrams needle biopsy, US-guided cutting needle biopsy, and medical thoracoscopy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic efficiencies of pleural biopsy methods; CT-guided Abrams needle, US-guided cutting needle and medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.5 years

The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of computed tomography guided Abrams needle pleural biopsy, ultrasonography guided cutting needle biopsy and medical thoracoscopy techniques in the diagnosis of pleural diseases.

Safety of pleural biopsy methods; CT-guided Abrams needle, US-guided cutting needle and medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: Rate of side effects.5 years

Rate of side effects comparing to each other for computed tomography guided Abrams needle pleural biopsy, ultrasonography guided cutting needle biopsy and medical thoracoscopy techniques in the diagnosis of pleural diseases.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Eskişehir, Turkey

ESOGU Medical Faculty Department of Chest Diseases

🇹🇷

Eskisehir, Meselik - Eskisehir, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath