Efficiency and Safety of Pleural Biopsy Methods in the Diagnosis of Pleural Diseases
- Conditions
- Medical ThoracoscopyDiagnosis of Pleural Diseases
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: CT-guided Abrams needle biopsy, US-guided cutting needle, medical thoracoscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT03153501
- Lead Sponsor
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University
- Brief Summary
Image-guided pleural biopsies, both ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) guided, and medical thoracoscopy are important in the diagnosis of pleural disease. However, no consensus exists regarding which biopsy methods are appropriate for specific procedures.
In this prospective study, the investigators aimed to compare CT-scan guided pleural biopsy using an Abrams' needle (CT-ANPB) with US-assisted pleural biopsy using a cutting needle (US-CNPB)and medical thoracoscopy with respect to both diagnostic yield and safety.
- Detailed Description
The primary end point of this study was the determination of the sensitivity and the complication rates of the invasive methods, Abrams needle pleural biopsy, tru-cut needle pleural biopsy, medical thoracoscopy with respect to the diagnosis of pleural disease.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 164
- Patients with pleural diseases
- Patients with other lung diseases
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Diagnostic arm CT-guided Abrams needle biopsy, US-guided cutting needle, medical thoracoscopy Patients with pleural diseases; malignant pleural diseases, tuberculous pleurisy, and other exudate required CT-guided Abrams needle biopsy, US-guided cutting needle biopsy, and medical thoracoscopy.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnostic efficiencies of pleural biopsy methods; CT-guided Abrams needle, US-guided cutting needle and medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value. 5 years The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of computed tomography guided Abrams needle pleural biopsy, ultrasonography guided cutting needle biopsy and medical thoracoscopy techniques in the diagnosis of pleural diseases.
Safety of pleural biopsy methods; CT-guided Abrams needle, US-guided cutting needle and medical thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: Rate of side effects. 5 years Rate of side effects comparing to each other for computed tomography guided Abrams needle pleural biopsy, ultrasonography guided cutting needle biopsy and medical thoracoscopy techniques in the diagnosis of pleural diseases.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty
🇹🇷Eskişehir, Turkey
ESOGU Medical Faculty Department of Chest Diseases
🇹🇷Eskisehir, Meselik - Eskisehir, Turkey