MedPath

Acute Efficacy and 6 Months Follow up After Electroconvulsive Therapy

Recruiting
Conditions
Depressive Disorder
Registration Number
NCT05388461
Lead Sponsor
Haukeland University Hospital
Brief Summary

The overall aim of the current project is to assess the acute and long term outcome of ECT (both patient and clinician rated) in a non-selected patient cohort from ordinary clinical activity, and to seek out factors predicting response and remission, side effects and relapse.

Detailed Description

Patients reffered to electroconvulsive ECT are (after written consent) enroled in a research registry. Based on (clinician and patient rated) measures of depressive symptoms and overall cognitive function, the short and long-term (6 months) efficacy of ECT will be described, and factors predicting response and relapse identified.

The duration of possible cognitive impairment and factors predicting cognitive outcome will be examined.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
600
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients treated with ECT for major depression (F31.3-5, F32, F33) at Haukeland University Hospital or Stavanger University Hospital after 2013,
  • written consent to enrolment into the Regional Register for neurostimulation.
Exclusion Criteria
  • ECT performed on other indications than major depression.
  • No consent to the register.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-NR) score from pretreatment at posttreatment; MMS-E range 0-30 with lower scores indicating more severe cognitive impairmentup to 8 weeks

overall cognitive function

Change of Everyday Memory Questionnaire (EMQ) score from pretreatment at posttreatment with higher scores indicating more severe impairmentup to 8 weeks

overall subjective cognitive function, patient rated

Change of Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from pretreatment at posttreatment; MADRS range 0 - 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression)up to 8 weeks

depressive symptoms

Change of Beck depression inventory (BDI) score from pretreatment at posttreatment; BDI range 0-63, with higher scores indicating more severe depressionup to 8 weeks

depressive symptoms, patient rated

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-NR) score from pretreatment at follow up, MMS-E range 0-30 with lower scores indicating more severe cognitive impairment6 months

overall cognitive function

Change of Subjective cognitive function score from pretreatment at posttreatmentup to 8 weeks

Likert scale

Change of Beck depression inventory (BDI) score from pretreatment at follow up, BDI range 0-63, with higher scores indicating more severe depression6 months

depressive symptoms, patient rated

Change of Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from pretreatment at follow up, MADRS range 0 - 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression)6 months

depressive symptoms

Change of Patient rated improvement (PGI) score from pretreatment at follow up6 months

Likert scale

Change of Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score from pretreatment at posttreatmentup to 8 weeks

Likert scale

Change of Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) from pretreatment at follow up6 months

Likert scale

Change of Patient rated improvement (PGI) score from pretreatment at posttreatmentup to 8 weeks

Likert scale

Change of Everyday Memory Questionnaire (EMQ) score from pretreatment at follow up6 months

overall subjective cognitive function, patient rated

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Haukeland University Hospital

🇳🇴

Bergen, Norway

Stavanger University Hospital

🇳🇴

Stavanger, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath