Which of the devices (LMA Protector or I-Gel)can be used for better airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery?
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/07/070526
- Lead Sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Females 18-60 years
ASA physical status I,II
Elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
Any significant lung disease
Patient refusal
Anticipated difficult intubation
Increased risk of aspiration
Body mass index more than 30
Gastroesophageal reflux
Neuromuscular disease
Pharyngeal dysfunction
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare the oropharyngeal leak pressures between the two supraglottic airway devices(LMA Protector and I-Gel) 15 min after <br/ ><br>pneumoperitoneum with head down tilt in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgeryTimepoint: 15 mins after pneumoperitoneum and trendelenberg position
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare between two devices <br/ ><br>OLP 10 mins after insertion <br/ ><br>Peak airway pressure <br/ ><br>Ease of insertion <br/ ><br>Insertion time <br/ ><br>Number of attempts taken <br/ ><br>Ease of gastric tube insertion <br/ ><br>Fibreopticglottic view <br/ ><br>Intraoperative & postoperative complications(laryngospam,blood staining of SGA, postoperative sore throat) <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 10 mins after insertion & 15 mins after pneumoperitoneum & trendelenberg position