COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES AND ITS NATURE
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/03/050879
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Madan
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
MALLAMPATTI 1 AND 2 , Patients undergoing Elective Surgery under GA requiring Endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
Anticipated Difficult Airway Like Mouth Opening Less than 2 cms, Mallampatti > , Restricted Neck Mobility and Other Causes of Oro Pharyngeal Malformation , Morbid Obesity , Patients having CVS , ESRD and DCLD Disease , Increased risk of Aspiration , or having symptoms of GERD , Musculoskeletal abnormailities of cervical vertebra
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the LMA insertion characteristics and intubation success rate of LMA FASTRACH vs LMA PROTECTOR using PVC Endotracheal tubesTimepoint: Baseline, 4 weeks and 6 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the ease of LMA insertion between LMA FASTRACH Vs LMA PROTECTOR, to compare the pharyngeal seal pressure , to compare the fiber optic view of vocal cords, to compare the number of attempts required for intubation, to compare the ease of intubation and to compare postoperative sore throat <br/ ><br>Timepoint: the hemodynamic parameters , the number of endotracheal intubation attempts , fibre-optic view of vocal cords, post operative sore throat is compared at 1st hour, 2nd hour,6th hour and 12th hour