MedPath

Efficacy of SAP Block Versus ESP Block in VATS Surgery

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
Interventions
Procedure: regional anaesthesia with Levobupivicaine 0.25% 30mls with two methods either erector spinae plane block or serratus anterior plane block
Registration Number
NCT03862612
Lead Sponsor
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Brief Summary

During VATS (Video assisted thoracic surgery) small incisions are made in the patient's chest through which a camera and instruments are inserted to allow a lung operation to be performed. Often patients experience a substantial amount of pain and difficult recovery after this type of operation. Anaesthesiologists sometimes use "Regional Anaesthesia" to minimise the pain and help patient recovery after the operation. This involves injecting local anaesthesia into the nerves around the chest wall to effectively numb that part of the chest. There is a variety of different locations on the chest wall where the local anaesthetic can be deposited and no study has measured whether one technique is better than the other in terms of improving patients' recovery experience. Our study compares two new techniques for Regional Anaesthesia after this type of surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to receive either a SAP (Serratus Anterior Plane) or ESP (Erector Spinae Plane) Block. Both techniques are described within last five years, but have never been compared for chest surgery

Detailed Description

The Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) Block has been claimed to be a safer, technically less demanding alternative to paravertebral block and thoracic epidural in the management of post operative VATS associated pain . Recently, another new block, the Erector Spinae Block (ESP Block) has been described for use in thoracic wall surgery. It has also been claimed to be easier to perform than these more traditional methods of regional anaesthesia. No study to date has compared ESP to SAP blocks in terms of efficacy of post operative analgesia after VATS surgery. Furthermore, patient-centres outcome studies now demand that researchers evaluate more than acute pain in the early postoperative period: A 15-parameter Quality of Recovery score (QoR-15) has been recommended as the optimum tool to evaluate overall patient-centres measures of recovery after surgery, including pain. This study will test the hypothesis that patients receiving ESP Block have higher QoR-15 scores and better post operative analgesia in comparison with patients receiving SAP Block after VATS surgery.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male and Female participants providing written informed consent,
  • ASA grade 1- 4,
  • aged over 18
  • undergoing a VATS procedure under General Anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
  • Absence of informed written consent,
  • pre existing infection at block site,-
  • severe coagulopathy,
  • allergy to local anaesthesia,
  • pre existing neurological deficit,
  • previous history of opiate abuse,
  • pre existing chronic pain condition,
  • pre-existing dementia [because of need to co-operate in completing QoR-15 score day after surgery].

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Erector Spinae Plane Blockregional anaesthesia with Levobupivicaine 0.25% 30mls with two methods either erector spinae plane block or serratus anterior plane blockThis group will receive an Erector Spinae Plane Block under ultrasound guidance while under General Anaesthesia
Serratus Anterior Plane Blockregional anaesthesia with Levobupivicaine 0.25% 30mls with two methods either erector spinae plane block or serratus anterior plane blockThis group will receive a Serratus Anterior Plane Block under ultrasound guidance while under General Anesthesia
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
the patient centred QoR-15 score among ESB and SAP block patients;1 year

A 15-parameter Quality of Recovery score (QoR-15) has been recommended as the optimum tool to evaluate overall patient-centres measures of recovery after surgery, including pain. It is a questionnaire that is given to patients to do post operatively and is scored from 0 to 150 where 150 indicates that the patient has a had an excellent recovery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
. VRS pain scores at 1 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr postop24 hours post op

0-10 where 10 equals severe pain and 0 is no pain

time to administration of first rescue analgesia after the block24hours post op
Area under the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) pain score versus time (24 hr post-op24 hours post op

Verbal Rating Scale pain score is measured from 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain

documentation of adverse events : hypotension, pruritus, nausea and vomiting24 hours post op

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

🇮🇪

Dublin, Ireland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath