Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00773604
NCT00773604
Completed
N/A

Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Patients With Dystonia

University of California, San Francisco2 sites in 1 country9 target enrollmentJune 2008
ConditionsDystonia

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Dystonia
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Enrollment
9
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
The Toronto Western Spasmodic Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Movement Scores Measured Before DBS Surgery (Baseline) and at 12 Months
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN)for primary dystonia.

Detailed Description

Dystonia is an uncommon brain disorder in which there is abnormal muscle tone producing twisting, writhing movements and abnormal postures. It is associated with abnormal electrical activity in two groups of nerve cells in the brain called the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to be an effective treatment in patients with medically refractory dystonia and is currently approved for both the GPi and STN targets under a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) for use in segmental and generalized primary dystonia as well as focal cervical dystonia. GPi DBS appears to be effective for medication-refractory focal and segmental dystonia affecting the cranial and cervical regions in open-label series, but recently GPi stimulation has been associated with subtle motor disturbances in previously non-dystonic body regions (i.e., arms and legs) in this population of patients. DBS of the STN has also been reported to be effective for treating generalized and cervical dystonia in small open label trials. STN DBS for cranial and cervical regions may provide similar efficacy in the treatment of dystonia as GPi DBS, but without unwanted stimulation-induced motor effects. Objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STN DBS for dystonia. Up to twenty-five patients will be screened, consented, and enrolled in this study. All patients will undergo bilateral STN DBS for dystonia. Participants will be evaluated pre- and postoperatively with standard dystonia rating scale Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), and a patient questionnaire will be administered postoperatively to determine if patients are experiencing stimulation-induced motor adverse effects and will be logged for safety monitoring. This pilot study will provide preliminary open label efficacy outcomes for STN DBS in the treatment of primary dystonia and will help determine if this target should be compared to GPi DBS in a larger double-blind trial.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2008
End Date
February 2015
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Refractory primary dystonia diagnosed by a movement disorders neurologist
  • Severe functional impairment despite optimal medical management, including failed botulinum toxin therapy
  • Age 7-80 years (UCSF patients) and 18-80 (VA patients)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients considered at high risk for elective neurosurgery because of co-morbid conditions
  • Brain MRI showing extensive brain atrophy or small vessel ischemic disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to tolerate awake microelectrode-guided neurosurgery
  • Inability to follow up with post-operative study visits
  • Inability to speak or read English
  • Patients with a score of 4.5 or lower on the BFMDRS movement scale
  • Patients with Secondary dystonia

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The Toronto Western Spasmodic Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Movement Scores Measured Before DBS Surgery (Baseline) and at 12 Months

Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months

Total TWSTRS score range is 0-88, where higher score indicates worse symptoms. Values are calculated by baseline minus 12 month, where higher difference score of change between baseline and 12 months means better outcome (more improvement)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials